Archive for Republicans
Some CIBO With Your Tea?
Posted by: | Comments
If you’re into seeing political candidates go head to head in public forums, then this is the week for you.
Thursday at Noon, barring another wintry postponement, Patsy Keever and Bruce Goforth will be fed identical meals of meat, green beans, and whipped taters before debating the issues of the day. CIBO is hosting this event at Magnolia’s. It’s ten bones to pay for your lunch, and the political theater is free. Read my previous post on the event here.
If you’ve got plans Friday night, you be better off bagging them and heading to the Tea Party at A/B Tech. The GOP candidates will line up at 6:30pm and get their liberty on. Erika Franzi, headmistress of the local Tea Folk, is soliciting questions from you and me. Click here to email her a question for the gang. The six candidates committed to attending are Dr. Dan Eichenbaum, James Howard, Ed Krause, Jeff Miller, Greg Newman, and Kenny West. Congressman Heath Shuler is invited as well, but he hasn’t signaled any inclination to sip from the same cup as the organizers or the broad field.
Dr. Dan has been winning straw polls across western North Carolina with his “We have seen enough ‘government solutions’” approach. The GOP faithful appear to be drawn more towards Jeff Miller and Greg Newman. But what do I know? If you’ve got the constitution, go see for yourself.
Big kudos to both groups for helping to educate the people and ask hard questions of the candidates. No matter our political differences, good campaigns make for better elections.
Independents Day
Posted by: | CommentsThe National Journal’s Mark Blumenthal analyzes this CNN poll of Tea Party independents:
Pollsters from CNN and the Opinion Research Corporation had identified 11 percent of Americans who said they have given money, attended rallies or taken other “active steps” to support the Tea Party movement. Of those who had, more identified themselves as independent (52 percent) than Republican (44 percent) or Democratic (4 percent).
But the article then adds a caution from CNN pollster Keating Holland that some will find puzzling: The apparent independence of Tea Party supporters “might be slightly misleading,” he said, “because 87 percent say they would vote for the GOP candidate in their congressional district if there were no third-party candidate endorsed by the Tea Party.”
After New Orleans drowned and Democrats swept the next two general elections, a lot of the Bush base became born-again independents and, as Digby said, have tried “to pretend that they weren’t genuflecting to his picture for the first six years of his presidency.”
Like many others on the political left, while the country went slowly to hell I spent years as an independent, partly because I was never much of a “joiner” and partly to avoid any taint on my clean, white vinyl soul. As John Sides, the George Washington University political scientist Blumenthal quotes writes, being registered independent doesn’t mean one is not an “independent leaner.” A friend once described himself as such an outsider that if he ever actually found himself on the inside of some group he would have to create an outside just to feel at home. Even he isn’t as independent as he lets on. Nor are most of the callers to the Ed Schultz show who preface their remarks by proclaiming their independence.
Blumenthal digs deeper into the CNN poll numbers:
Remember the 52 percent of Tea Party activists who initially identify as independent? It turns out that virtually all of them lean Republican. According to CNN, 88 percent of the activists identify or lean Republican, 6 percent identify or lean Democratic and only 5 percent fall into the pure independent category.
The lack of followup questions in much opinion polling clouds the view, leading to the Beltway’s belief that independents have grown to a third of the country since Obama took office. We’ll see just how independent they are this November.
The Fate Of Gay Conservatism
Posted by: | CommentsDavid Boze, Executive Vice President of the Cato Institute:
“It seems to me, that for the past 70 years or so, conservatives…have opposed the demands for liberation and equal rights by Jews, Blacks, Women, and Gay People. And now, Republicans wonder why they don’t get many votes from those groups. The good news is, that once each struggle for civil rights has been clearly won, conservatives accept it and insist that, in fact, they never opposed it.”
“After a generation of insisting that a mother’s place is in the home, conservatives spent 2008 declaring that the right place for a mother of five, one of them pregnant and one a newborn with special needs, is next-door to the Oval Office. But the Civil Rights struggle of our own time is that of gay and lesbian people and conservatives are still performing their traditional role of opposing it.”
I hope you’ll listen to the truly fascinating discussion over at The Daily Dish. Because as we’ve learned around here recently, you don’t have to be a Republican to be a bigot. Or even a white man.
Are Those Cameras Off?
Posted by: | Comments
Et tu, Wall Street Journal?
Using letters it obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Wall Street Journal chronicles how GOP critics of the stimulus bill wrote letters supporting stimulus projects in their districts:
Rep. Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican who called the stimulus a “wasteful spending spree” that “misses the mark on all counts,” wrote to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis in October in support of a grant application from a group in his district which, he said, “intends to place 1,000 workers in green jobs.” A spokeswoman for Mr. Ryan said the congressman felt it was his job to provide “the basic constituent service of lending his assistance for federal grant requests.”
Republican Reps. Sue Myrick of North Carolina and Jean Schmidt of Ohio sent letters in October asking for consideration of funding requests from local organizations training workers for energy-efficiency projects.
In November, Ms. Schmidt said in a statement, “It is time to recall the stimulus funds that have not been spent before the Chinese start charging us interest.” Aides to the congresswomen said they had always supported local organizations in their requests for federal funding.
Spokesmen “didn’t respond to a request for comment” crops up a couple of times in the WSJ story. Rachael Maddow was on MSNBC Tuesday night waving these letters letters from various Republicans supporting requests from groups in their districts for stimulus money they voted against. Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC) wrote in support of a National Urban League request:
Funding this application will make it possible for “green jobs training” to benefit 250 participants in greater Charlotte, NC and lead to solar energy related jobs in an area hard hit by unemployment. We have an urgent need for a workforce that is truly prepared to contribute to the “Green” economy.
The entire Alabama delegation signed a letter supporting a $15 million funding request by the Alabama Forestry Commission. Senator Richard Shelby, who called the stimulus bill “the socialist way” during the debate, said “way” once stimulus funds became available.
RNC Winter Meeting: Saving Americans from Themselves
Posted by: | Comments“These poor bastards just didn’t realize they were living in a socialist nightmare …” [timestamp 6:04]
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| The Apparent Trap | ||||
|
||||
Choose a Side
Posted by: | CommentsOver at Daily Kos, Darcy Burner poses this challenge:
Next week, there’s going to be a test in Congress. A real litmus test about whose side various Representatives and Senators are on. It’s a stunningly straightforward bill – only two pages long – that would simply remove the antitrust exemption for health insurers. It would keep insurers from being able to collude and price fix, requiring them to compete in the marketplace for business.
Unlike nearly everything else that’s been done in the last year, this bill is completely uncompromised – no deals have been cut to water down the bill in favor of health insurance companies. It is an unambiguously populist bill, and a clean cut against corporatism. It’s building off of work that key progressives in the House, including Reps. DeFazio, Slaughter, and DeGette, have been teeing up for years.
Assuming the Perriello-Markey bill makes it onto the floor, no one in Congress should be allowed to duck their vote for the insurance companies and against their constituents. Hagan, Shuler and the rest of NC’s delegation should know, as Darcy explains, Vote against this bill, and it means you’re in the pocket of the insurance companies.
As Digby said, “The campaign ads write themselves, don’t they?”
Choose a side. We’ve already chosen.
Losing The Narrative Battle: Progressives Need To Turn Pro
Posted by: | CommentsNo, the facts will not set you free. Time after time, progressives lose the narrative battle to the superior messaging firepower of the conservative movement. The facts don’t matter if you can’t sell them.
President Obama spoke again to GOP leaders at their caucus’ retreat in Baltimore on Friday. Again, because the first group Obama met with upon taking office a year ago was the GOP leadership. (He met with conservative pundits for dinner at George Will’s house before the inauguration.) Obama even invited more Republicans to join his cabinet than any of his Democratic predecessors. Those are the facts. Not that they matter.
In Baltimore, Obama called out Republicans for portraying health care reforms supported by the likes of Republican former Senate Majority Leaders Bob Dole and Howard Baker as some kind of “Bolshevik plot.” The rebuke drew suppressed laughter and scattered applause — not for the president’s joke, likely, but for the success of their anti-reform narrative.
Supporters are sure to read Obama’s Baltimore performance as some kind of takedown. But don’t expect to hear about it beyond YouTube. The left may sometimes take the narrative high ground but cannot hold it. Conservatives will still appear on the Sunday talk shows to declare unblinkingly that the world is flat: Obama has gone too far left, attempted too much, not been bipartisan, etc. As Bill McKibben wrote of the Christian right, “by their very boldness [they] convince the rest of us that they must know what they’re talking about.” And listeners swallow it without even bothering to chew.
The progressive movement lacks the professional media training and support infrastructure conservatives use to train and retain such media spokesmen.
Case in point: James O’Keefe and his alleged co-conspirators arrested last week after an incident at Louisiana Democrat Sen. Mary Landrieu’s offices in New Orleans. O’Keefe became a conservative hero last year after posting doctored video “stings” shot at offices of the community organizing group, ACORN. O’Keefe is an alumnus and former employee of the Leadership Institute in Arlington, Virginia, a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) charity and one of conservatism’s top training camps since 1979. Among the school’s more prominent alumni are Karl Rove, Ralph Reed, Grover Norquist and Republican Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. O’Keefe received a $500 “Balance in Media” grant through the Leadership Institute for starting a conservative college monthly, the Rutgers Centurion. O’Keefe can expect a steady paycheck from movement conservatives even if he spends time in jail.
Along with paid internships at Heritage and other think tanks, the conservative movement provides a career track for budding activists. With few exceptions (the Center for Progressive Leadership among them), progressive organizations take a different approach. More progressive energy goes into winning short-term electoral gains than into promoting a progressive narrative over the long haul. Because many jobs are temporary, volunteer or low-paid, progressives eventually lose much of their promising new talent.
Markos Moulitsas and Jerome Armstrong discussed the Leadership Institute in Crashing the Gate, contrasting the conservative training and employment infrastructure with the lack of a progressive one. Progressives expect their activists to work for “psychic income” rather than a living wage:
On our side, we face a steady stream of defections to the private sector where the pay is far better. As Napoleon said, an army travels on its stomach, a lesson progressive leaders have yet to learn. We train them young, teach them the ropes, and as they reach the age where they could take a more active leadership role in the movement, they decide they can’t live with six roommates, default on their student loans, and eat Ramen noodles for dinner every night. They decide they want things like a car in good working order, they want to own a home, and they want to feel that their efforts are properly compensated.
The Leadership Institute has spent about $11 million a year recently to train new conservative leaders for a lifetime of spreading the conservative gospel. After South Carolina Republican Rep. Joe Wilson shouted “You lie!” at Obama last summer, his opponent, Rob Miller, raised over $1 million dollars in small donations in two days. Given the left’s proven success at online fundraising, progressives should lend that kind of support annually for expanding their training infrastructure and for funding progressive media professionals — not to emulate the Roves, the Reeds and the O’Keefes, but to reach voters more effectively. Or we can continue to shout at our televisions and bang our heads against the wall.
Progressive think tanks have enjoyed greater presence lately in a media environment typically dominated by conservative ones. Yet progressive efforts at controlling the popular narrative still appear amateurish in the face of the high-decibel weirdness on the right. Hunter Thompson said, “When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.” It is time that progressives turned pro as well.
(Cross-posted from the Huffington Post.)
Bought and Paid For
Posted by: | Comments“It’s our democracy. We bought it, we paid for it, and we’re going to keep it.” – Vote Murray Hill Incorporated for Congress! Murray Hill, Inc. adds,
“Until now,” Murray Hill Inc. said in a statement, “corporate interests had to rely on campaign contributions and influence peddling to achieve their goals in Washington. But thanks to an enlightened Supreme Court, now we can eliminate the middle-man and run for office ourselves.”
Murray Hill, Inc. wants to run in the Republican congressional primary in Maryland’s 8th district. “Clearly, I don’t know how much more Republican a corporation can be,” Murray Hill Inc., designated human spokesperson, Eric Hensal, told Thom Hartmann in an interview here.
[h/t Crooks and Liars]
Tea Party Congressional Candidate Debate
Posted by: | CommentsWhile the time and venue are TBD, the event is on for March 5th.
Asheville Tea Party is hosting a debate for all candidates for North Carolina’s 11th District US House Seat.
[...]
We are now accepting submissions of questions for the candidates. The debate moderator will choose questions based on their potential to elicit the most information from the candidates and their relevance to the core values of the Asheville Tea Party.
[...]
“At the end of the debate, attendees will vote for their choice of candidate by process of range voting. Once tabulated, the results will be posted at our website.”
It’s good to see the Republican candidates out there on the stump. Retail politickin’. Kudos also to Erika Franzi for organizing the opportunity for people to get to know who’s running.
Rather than flood janeq’s email box with your suggestions for questions to the candidates, I thought you could leave them in the comments.
Oh if you’re a bird, be an early bird
Posted by: | CommentsSpeaking of Republicans, the North Carolina primary is only 111 days away, and I haven’t heard much in the way of revival music coming out of the GOP’s little tent lately. This time two years ago, Carl Mumpower already had his congressional primary campaign in full swing (in fact, I think we had even cut his TV commercial by now) — but aside from a few lackluster appearances from a partial complement of candidates, there hasn’t been much to tell me that anybody is doing much on the Republican side.
There are six guys that I’m aware of who are vying for the dubious honor of taking on Heath Shuler: Dan Eichenbaum, James J. Howard, Ed Krause, Greg Newman, Scott Stump, and Kenny West. Only two have active websites (Eichenbaum and Howard) and West’s Facebook page seems to have dried up and blown away — although you can see a cached version here. From what I’m told, Greg Newman hasn’t showed up to either of the two forums held so far (which were apparently poorly attended), and when it’s not regurgitating press releases from the Tea Party folks, the Buncombe County GOP’s website doesn’t tell me much either.
Asheville Tea Party is hosting a debate for all candidates for North Carolina’s 11th District US House Seat.