Archive for Republicans

Aug
29

Good Canvass Yesterday

Posted by: Tom Sullivan | Comments (10)

Had fun yesterday. We had over a dozen canvassers show up on Saturday to knock on a bunch of doors — even after a couple of complaints about a certain congressman’s health care vote. Those who showed up know that holding the U.S. House and Senate and the fate of the next state redistricting all comes down to turnout.

Wanna see Richard Burr sent packing? Get up offa that thing and help no-nonsense Elaine Marshall. We’ll be knocking on doors every Saturday in September. Or if that doesn’t get your blood up, help Joyce Elliot defeat alleged, vote-caging Rove protege, Tim Griffin in AR-2. And there are plenty of other places your efforts are needed, if not here. Blue America has their approved picks and ActBlue has the full list.

Anyway, we ran across this OFA ad that we thought it summed up the situation pretty well:

And Blue America is looking for help in running this ad just east of here:

Or you can stay home and gripe. If you liked the Clinton impeachment, you’ll love the Obama impeachment.

Aug
28

Shuler – Miller

Posted by: Gordon Smith | Comments (65)

Lots to discuss. RCP ranking the NC-11 race a toss-up. Speaker? Jobs fair. Miller Ad. Buncombe’s jilted progressives. BCGOP shenanigans.

Shuler’s votes on energy, environment, education, and labor look great. Shuler’s votes on health care and civil rights don’t. GOP’s lame attempts to again tie him to a demonized Pelosi look silly.

Heath Shuler is monied, and Jeff Miller is not. The Asheville Tea Party decided not to endorse Miller, so the WNCGOP formed their own Tea Party to make sure he got a Tea Party endorsement of some sort. The Buncombe GOP is putatively leaderless. The Buncombe Dems have a lot of energy, but will they have vols? Can Susan Fisher, Patsy Keever, and Jane Whilden coattails translate into votes for Heath?

I can’t wait to hear everyone’s take on the race. Fire away in the comments. You can bet that both campaigns will be reading.

Disclaimer – I am definitely voting for Rep. Heath Shuler.

John Armor in 2006John Armor (aka: Congressman BillyBob) died this morning of colon cancer at St Joesph’s hospital in Asheville, NC. He was 67.

We disagreed on every possible political issue – but I liked him because he was a decent man, an attentive husband, and an excellent writer who loved his country.

John was a lawyer, a writer, and Republican activist. He wrote 8 books on a range of topics from fiction, to the Japanese American internment camp at Manzanar, to term limits, to his most recent work: These Are The Times That Try Men’s Souls – an annotated version of Tom Paine’s most famous writings. (He was particularly proud of this last book.)

I first met John Armor in 2006 during his run in the Republican primary against congressional incumbent Charles “Chainsaw” Taylor. For those of you who don’t know: Taylor was a corrupt local politician who wasn’t known for dealing kindly with opposition. It took a lot of guts for John to step up to the plate and challenge him.

At the time I was an active progressive blogger at Brainshrub.com. (Now defunct) John was the first Republican candidate in NC11 to agree to a sit-down interview with bloggers. You can read about the interview here. I was stuck my his sincerity, intelligence, and willingness to listen to viewpoints different from his own.

Armor ran for congress again in 2008, then settled into retirement. He remained active in the Republican party and occasionally played the character of Benjamin Franklin. You can enjoy one of his performances here. (Show starts at 3:33 seconds)

I visited John in the hospital less than 48 hours ago. He was in high-spirits after his latest surgery, and doctors had given him an optimistic prognosis. His wife Michelle by his bedside, he joked that regardless of the outcome the doctors work on his colon had made him “A Perfect Asshole.”

We talked about local politics, about the governments role in infrastructure, and about his life in general. John was a man who talked the talk and walked the walk. He cared deeply about his community, and left the world a better place than he left it.

RIP John. You were one of the few hard-core conservatives I could talk too without raising my blood-pressure.

- pvh

Aug
07

I, Barbarian

Posted by: Tom Sullivan | Comments (3)

California's governor

(updated below)

The New York Times’ Bob Herbert laments America’s falling educational achievement levels. The College Board reports that America “has fallen to 12th among 36 developed nations” in the percentage of young people with college degrees. The current generation, the College Board cautions, “will not approach their parents’ level of education.” Herbert raises the alarm about a society “that often holds intellectual achievement in contempt”:

What is the matter with us? Have we been drinking? Whatever happened to that vaunted American dream? In Hawaii, the public schools were closed on 17 Fridays during the past school year for budget reasons.

When this is the educational environment, you can say goodbye to the kind of cultural, scientific and economic achievements that combine to make a great nation. We no longer know how to put our people to work. We read less and less and write like barbarians. We’ve increasingly turned our backs on the very idea of hard-won excellence while flinging open the doors to decadence and decline. No wonder Lady Gaga and Snooki from “Jersey Shore” are cultural heroes.

Of course, “What’s the matter with kids today?” goes back at least to Paul Lynde and Bye, Bye Birdie (1963). But honestly, things are a bit worse than Herbert lets on, as South Carolina Republican, Congressman Bob Inglis, told Mother Jones this week in Confessions of a Tea Party Casualty. Once it was conservative oldsters who complained the loudest about unruly kids. Now their “intellectual” heirs are voters like these — and a party turned toward “demagoguery and hucksterism” — who want to control the world’s largest nuclear arsenal [emphasis mine]:

During his primary campaign, Inglis repeatedly encountered enraged conservatives whom he couldn’t—or wouldn’t—satisfy. Shortly before the runoff primary election, Inglis met with about a dozen tea party activists at the modest ranch-style home of one of them. Here’s what took place:

I sat down, and they said on the back of your Social Security card, there’s a number. That number indicates the bank that bought you when you were born based on a projection of your life’s earnings, and you are collateral. We are all collateral for the banks. I have this look like, “What the heck are you talking about?” I’m trying to hide that look and look clueless. I figured clueless was better than argumentative. So they said, “You don’t know this?! You are a member of Congress, and you don’t know this?!” And I said, “Please forgive me. I’m just ignorant of these things.” And then of course, it turned into something about the Federal Reserve and the Bilderbergers and all that stuff. And now you have the feeling of anti-Semitism here coming in, mixing in. Wow.

Wow, indeed.

UPDATE: Speaking of barbarism, Glenn Greenwald points to a recent Wall Street Journal article about how cash-strapped states are letting paved roads revert to gravel — ‘Back to Stone Age,’ the Journal suggests. The trend is part of the spreading decline in public infrastructure — schools, buses, even streetlights — as the economic downturn lengthens, “what a collapsing empire looks like,” Greenwald suggests.

So how about we invade Iran looking for WMDs next?

Categories : National, Republicans
Comments (3)
Jul
29

About Elizabeth Warren

Posted by: Tom Sullivan | Comments (4)

About Elizabeth Warren — she came to Netroots looking for support, and she found it. She needs yours too.

Everyone agreed she should be the head of the new consumer protection agency, but Obama’s Rubinistas aren’t too keen on the idea. Warren is not a technocrat. She’s not a Washington insider and not owned by the right people.

Warren has a unique quality when she speaks about the plight of American families. There is an urgency. Her voice doesn’t exactly crack, but you feel her passion for their struggles. She wears it right out in the open. You know she believes in the mission. That’s what scares the Big Money Boyz: she would actually do the job. All the more reason average people trust her to lead the effort.

So we have to convince Obama to do the right thing. (Here‘s where you can do that.) Beside, going into this fall’s elections, Obama will need all the good karma he can get, says Paul Krugman:

I have to say, I don’t get the administration waffling on Elizabeth Warren at all.

Leave aside the merits of appointing Warren, which are considerable, and think about the politics. At this point, not appointing Warren would be seen by the base as a slap in the face, and would seriously dampen enthusiasm going into the midterms. And Democrats need every bit of enthusiasm they can muster to avoid a Republican takeover of the House.

Digby talks about Warren’s advocacy for families and for how the revolving door between D.C. and Wall Street must end:

I heard Warren speak at Netroots Nation and she was eloquent on all of this. It’s clear that her focus is on working families and not the banks and Wall Street. It’s vital that someone represents those interests and she’s the right one to do it because she comes to it with a political constituency (albeit one that is despised by certain members of the administration) but one which Obama will need as he goes into 2012 against the spoiled princes who are so rich that they are now more worried about being loved by strangers than they are about taking care of the golden goose. (After all, the administration has hardly laid a substantive glove on them, but they get hysterical at every tiny affront to their dignity.)

Give Elizabeth Warren a recommend here. Or you can go straight to the White House.

Comments (4)
Jul
11

It’s Called An L3C

Posted by: Tom Sullivan | Comments (3)

There’s a new company in town — an L3C. Okay, it’s not here yet, but as soon as Gov. Perdue signs SB 308, North Carolina will join Michigan, Vermont, Illinois, Wyoming, Utah, and (in 2011) Maine in allowing this hybrid business entity that appeared first in Vermont just two years ago. It is the kind of vehicle we could use to help put workers displaced by plant closings back to work in WNC. Wikipedia describes the L3C this way:

The L3C is a low-profit limited liability company (LLC), that functions via a business modality that is a hybrid legal structure combining the financial advantages of the limited liability company, an LLC, with the social advantages of a non-profit entity. An L3C runs like a regular business and is profitable. However, unlike a for-profit business, the primary focus of the L3C is not to make money, but to achieve socially beneficial aims, with profit making as a secondary goal. The L3C thus occupies a niche between the for-profit and charitable sectors.

Henredon Furniture, Morganton, NC (Burke County)

N.C. Senator Jim Jacumin, a Republican who represents Burke and Caldwell Counties, introduced the Senate bill which passed in the House on Thursday without a single No vote. The N.C. Center for Nonprofits described his intentions:

N.C. Senator Jacumin envisioned L3Cs as collaborations between local nonprofits and failing furniture or textile businesses. These L3Cs would use investments (direct investments, grants, or low-interest loans) from private foundations, businesses, and individuals to purchase and upgrade factories to make them more energy efficient and less expensive to operate. The L3Cs could then lease these factories to manufacturers at competitive rates that would help keep manufacturing jobs in local communities.

The purpose of the L3C is to assist small businesses that might not be able to get off the ground if they had to pay investors a commercial rate of return. Like MOOMilk, a local organic milk company in Maine. Like small-business start-ups in struggling towns with high unemployment. Or to renovate existing factory space. Or newspapers big and small, for example. For the socially responsible investor, this is a way to do good — including put people back to work — and make a few bucks along the way. The L3C’s creator, Robert Lang, CEO of The Mary Elizabeth and Gordon B. Mannweiler Foundation, Inc., calls it “the for profit with a non profit soul.”

Rush Limbaugh calls it an idea thought up by liberal “wackos.” Rush believes “this is social engineering … designed to pervert capitalism” and “propagandize the American people in the name of the Obama administration.”

Where do I send the check?

Then again, maybe Ashevillians should just invest in more high-priced condos?

Comments (3)

Image: Rocky Grimes, "Carrot and Stick", screen print and mixed media, 2009

It’s been fascinating to watch political leaders (on the right and on the left) cut off unemployment insurance to millions of unemployed Americans they will ask to vote for them this November. “Nearly five” job seekers for every job opening doesn’t dissuade them from their “common sense” notion that continuing unemployment insurance payments is a disincentive for the unemployed to go back to work. In January, South Carolina Lieutenant Governor Andre Bauer gave a twisted primer on using hunger as an incentive for driving the unemployed back into jobs that aren’t there:

“My grandmother was not a highly educated woman, but she told me as a small child to quit feeding stray animals. You know why? Because they breed. You’re facilitating the problem if you give an animal or a person ample food supply. They will reproduce, especially ones that don’t think too much further than that. And so what you’ve got to do is you’ve got to curtail that type of behavior. They don’t know any better.”

Speaking of not knowing any better, the blind faith such conservatives have in the power of incentives to control others’ behavior is misplaced. Yet it is fundamental to the way many Americans think about the world and about capitalism. Incentives, the rhetoric suggests, are as mechanistic (and as magical) as the Market. The problem is, commonsense folk wisdom — like the Earth being flat — is sometimes wrong even if you learned it at your grandmother’s knee. “Sweeter carrots and sharper sticks” don’t always work the way common sense suggests. Sometimes they work just the opposite, studies have shown. But folk wisdom dies hard, especially if it reinforces your underlying ideology, and if facts that don’t support your ideology are dismissed as not “true facts.”

Daniel Pink summarizes the current research on incentives. For the kind of work more Americans will be doing in the 21st century, for tasks requiring “even rudimentary cognitive skill,” the traditional extrinsic incentive model doesn’t work:

“Those if-then rewards, the things around which we’ve built so many of our businesses, don’t work … This is not a feeling, okay? I’m a lawyer. I don’t believe in feelings. This is not a philosophy. I’m an American. I don’t believe in philosophy. This is a fact. Or as they say in my hometown of Washington, D.C., a true fact.

Categories : Economy, Republicans, Science
Comments (10)
Jul
04

Unusually Spoiled

Posted by: Tom Sullivan | Comments (3)

“A city is made of brick, Pharoah. The strong make many. The weak make few. The dead make none.”
– Charlton Heston as Moses, after feeding the slaves in The Ten Commandments

As in Cecil B. DeMille’s Egypt, today’s Royals take a dim view of feeding slaves. Thirty-eight Republicans voted this week in the U.S. Senate to cut off unemployment checks for the long-term unemployed. Plus Ben Nelson (D-NE).  (Did someone give Nelson a hat with elephant ears, like something on an early Disney TV show?) Congressional Republicans have suggested that those out of work in the worst unemployment since the Great Depression are druggies, bums, lazy and animals.

Huffington Post noted earlier this week that this would be the first time unemployment benefits have been allowed to expire when the unemployment rate was above 7.2 percent. But as Nevada Republican Senate nominee Sharron Angle explained, support payments have “spoiled” our slaves citizenry. They just don’t want to get out there and take “entry level” jobs when government unemployment pays more (it doesn’t). Angle continued, “There are jobs that do exist. That’s what we’re saying, is that there are jobs.”

Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com contradicted that assessment just one month ago:

“I mean, just a statistic, for every one job opening there’s five people that are looking for work. That is incredibly unusual, so therefore its premature to give up on those emergency benefits.”

Digby points to a chart from Calculated Risk showing (compared to past recessions) just how unusually spoiled the unemployed of 2010 have become in the You’re On Your Ownership Society.

For some perspective on the kind of low-lifes that refuse to work at jobs they think are beneath them, I give you Scott Talbott, chief lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable, who last year expressed strong reservations about restrictions on executive compensation:

Executives may quit banks that fall under the new $500,000 pay limits, he warned.

“I don’t think the issue is a dollar amount. It’s being paid what you’re worth… Would you be willing to work for less than what you think you’re worth?” Talbott asked.

So … druggies, bums, lazy or animals?

Comments (3)
Jun
27

The Parable of the GOP Samaritan

Posted by: Tom Sullivan | Comments (3)

Conservative Talking Point: Liberals believe they know what’s best for you.

Conservative Action Item: We believe what’s best is for us not to help you and your family with your own tax dollars … during the country’s worst unemployment since the Great Depression.

Rachel Maddow lets GOP leaders make their case in their own words:


Is that really what Christ meant by “Go, and do thou likewise“?

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) stated the progressive viewpoint just recently [timestamp 8:13]: “We’re following a 3,000 year-old imperative … That’s very simple. It’s to feed the hungry, to shelter the homeless, and to heal the sick. That’s what we believe in.”

On health care this week, Grayson observed: “The nation is divided between people who want health care and people who don’t want other people to have health care.”

The differences couldn’t be plainer, or put more plainly. Go, and do thou likewise.

Comments (3)
Jun
18

Joe Biden On Joe Barton and BP

Posted by: Gordon Smith | Comments (1)
YouTube Preview Image

Comments (1)