Archive for Satire
Praise GOPsus!
Posted by: | CommentsOn NPR’s Morning Edition on Monday, Barbara Bradley Hagerty looked at the question of whether Jesus was in favor of small government, as some conservatives believe.
HAGERTY: For other religious conservatives, the Bible is a blueprint for robust capitalism. Recently, on his radio program, “Wallbuilders,” David Barton and a guest discussed Jesus’ parable of the vineyard owner.In it, the owner pays the worker he hires at the end of the day the same wage as he pays the one who begins work in the morning. Many theologians have long interpreted this as God’s grace being available right up to the last minute. But Barton sees the parable as a bar to collective bargaining.
DAVID BARTON: Where were unions in all this? The contract is between an employer and an employee. It’s not between a group. He went out and hired individually the guys he wanted to work.
David. Seriously. Can you hear yourself? You’re telling me that the wandering rabbi, Jesus, told his peasant disciples the parable of the vineyard two thousand years ago as a lesson in avoiding collective bargaining in negotiating employment contracts?
That’s not the Bible you’re reading from, pal. It’s Jesus Shrugged.
HAGERTY: Peter Montgomery at People for the American Way says conservative evangelicals have been arguing for years that the Bible favors a free market system. But since Barack Obama was elected, he says, they’ve shifted into high gear.PETER MONTGOMERY: They are finding biblical justification for opposition to progressive taxation, opposition to unions and collective bargaining, opposition to the minimum wage, opposition even to social welfare spending and Social Security.
Richard Land at the Southern Baptist Convention, for example:
RICHARD LAND: The Bible tells us that socialism and neo-socialism never worked. Confiscatory tax rates never work … People aren’t going to work very hard and very productively unless they get to keep a substantial portion of that which they make for them and for their families.
Right. Second Chronicles 17:35. Richard, can you hear yourself?
What’s next? Jesus died on the cross to make a case for capital punishment?
Praise GOPsus!
Trans-actional probe
Posted by: | Comments
The Republican War on Women demonstrates their oh-so-conservative decision to govern by the precautionary principle. Small-government conservatives have decided it is government’s job to ensure that women view ultrasound videos and have transvaginal probes before having a legal abortion. Clearly, they want to ensure — in a consumer-protectiony kind of way — that women, people, are fully and thoroughly informed of the potential consequences before making such deeply personal decisions. Since Republicans clearly have decided it is government’s job to ensure that they are, shouldn’t we apply the same governing principle to other important personal decisions with potentially life-changing consequences? How about a trans-actional probe?
Progressives Go Galt!
Posted by: | CommentsSara Robinson, Visions editor at Alternet, lays down the Galtlet. A recent NYT piece reported a fact that many of us know already: blue states pay more into the federal treasury than they get back; red states, Mother Jones observes, take more money from Washington than they put in.
Progressives believe in the redistribution of wealth, so we’re not usually too upset by this state of affairs. That’s what it means to be one country. E pluribus unum, and all that. We’re happy to help, because we think we’ve got a stake in making sure kids in rural Alabama get educations and seniors in Arizona get healthcare. What’s good for them is good for all of us. We also like to think they’d help us out if our positions were reversed. It’s an investment in making America stronger, and we feel fine about that.
It’s not that blue staters resent helping out, writes Robinson, it’s the pissing and moaning from the self-righteous states Ayn Rand herself would describe as “parasites.”
So we’ve got every right to get good and angry about the fact that, by and large, the people who are getting our money are so damned ungrateful — not to mention so ridiculously eager to spend it on stuff we don’t approve of. We didn’t ship them our hard-earned tax dollars to see them squandered on worse-than-useless abstinence-only education, textbooks that teach creationism, crisis-pregnancy misinformation centers, subsidies for GMO crops and oil companies, and so on. And we sure as hell didn’t expect to be rewarded for our productivity and generosity with a rising tide of spittle-flecked insanity about how we’re just a bunch of immoral, godless, drug-soaked, sex-crazed, evil America-hating traitors who can’t wait to hand the country over to the Islamists and the Communists.
Robinson suggests that blue staters Go Galt and let the by-your-own-bootstraps crowd pull themselves up by their own bootstraps and take responsibility for everything from the free-market viability of their farm products to their children’s competitiveness in the job market.
We realize some of you aren’t too keen on public schools. It’s great that you want to take on more personal responsibility for educating your own kids. Just be warned: if you don’t teach them real science and real history — including evolution, climate change and the actual contents of the US Constitution — we’re probably not going to hire them. So we hope you’re also ready to take responsibility for that, too, which will probably mean supporting your grown kids in your basement until you die.
Made me laugh out loud several times. Enjoy.
Socialist You
Posted by: | CommentsThe late George Carlin had this comedy bit involving a four-letter word starting with S. He marveled at how it was this all-purpose expletive. He provided lots of examples. What fascinated Carlin was how everyone used the S-word figuratively. Almost never literally.
Socialist is like that. Conservatives started throwing the word around with gusto when Barack Obama began running for president. Socialist is the conservative all-purpose epithet beginning with S.
Of course, they never use it literally, either. Most could not define socialism if you put their own guns to their heads. But as an all-purpose slur, precision is not the point. As in, “If I ever get my hands on that socializing, socialistic socialist, I’m gonna shove my socializing boot right up his socialist butt!”
Let Them Eat … Soon
Posted by: | CommentsMoney Talks – The Haves & the Soon-to-Haves
John Hodgman explains that the haves are creating an exclusive world of luxury and privilege for the soon-to-haves to have — soon.
This Chinese Life
Posted by: | CommentsA couple of weeks ago, “This American Life” aired a story titled “Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory,” about life in the Chinese factory that makes the iPhone and other consumer electronics. Apparently, others took notice. “The Daily Show,” for example.
I wonder if the dormitories in the clip are the ones they show to the press?
Attack In B Minor For Strings
Posted by: | CommentsWasting no time, the “definitely not coordinating with Stephen Colbert Super PAC” strikes:

