Author Archive
Healthcare for those who can afford it
Posted by: | Comments“Hi, Tom. When did you get back in town? Your regular table is available. Can I get you a Guinness?”
It’s a creaky little pub at the edge of downtown Charlotte where, well, everybody knows your name. In a town filled with prefab, coming in for dinner is like coming home.
“Linda” is one of the regular waitresses and hadn’t seen me in a couple of months. The first thing she wanted to tell me was that she had finally scheduled a surgery to remove the lump on the right side of her neck. It’s been growing since we met in August last year, but with little money and no insurance, she’s been unable to do anything about it. The lump is now about the size of a small potato and making her jawline disappear.
She didn’t say how much the surgery might cost, but it almost cost her several thousand dollars more. The clinic told her that this type of surgery was usually done on Fridays. Being a waitress, that wasn’t her best financial strategy. They told Linda she could move it to Monday and she jumped at the idea. Only after asking did she find out it would cost a couple thousand dollars more to get the surgery done on Monday. She stayed with Friday.
No one at the clinic offered that information up front. “If I hadn’t asked,” Linda said, sounding exasperated, “I would have paid all that money extra. It would be like me serving you beer in a bottle without telling you that you could get the same beer for less on draft.”
As is, Linda will be making payments on the surgery for — she doesn’t know for how long.
“The best health care system in the world,” for those who can afford it.
Why Johnny Can’t Reason
Posted by: | CommentsA recent dip into conservative drive-time talk radio raised Michael Shermer’s question: Why do smart people believe weird things?
It’s not as if the conservative talk audience is all Mensa members. (Sean Hannity, at least, need not apply.) And it’s not as if the left doesn’t believe its share of nonsense. It’s that conservative “experts” with educational pedigrees and elite-sounding, non-elitist titles spout ideas they expect listeners to accept without question.
Like how replacing employer-based health insurance with health savings accounts means a $10,000 raise for the average family.
Independents Day
Posted by: | CommentsThe National Journal’s Mark Blumenthal analyzes this CNN poll of Tea Party independents:
Pollsters from CNN and the Opinion Research Corporation had identified 11 percent of Americans who said they have given money, attended rallies or taken other “active steps” to support the Tea Party movement. Of those who had, more identified themselves as independent (52 percent) than Republican (44 percent) or Democratic (4 percent).
But the article then adds a caution from CNN pollster Keating Holland that some will find puzzling: The apparent independence of Tea Party supporters “might be slightly misleading,” he said, “because 87 percent say they would vote for the GOP candidate in their congressional district if there were no third-party candidate endorsed by the Tea Party.”
After New Orleans drowned and Democrats swept the next two general elections, a lot of the Bush base became born-again independents and, as Digby said, have tried “to pretend that they weren’t genuflecting to his picture for the first six years of his presidency.”
Like many others on the political left, while the country went slowly to hell I spent years as an independent, partly because I was never much of a “joiner” and partly to avoid any taint on my clean, white vinyl soul. As John Sides, the George Washington University political scientist Blumenthal quotes writes, being registered independent doesn’t mean one is not an “independent leaner.” A friend once described himself as such an outsider that if he ever actually found himself on the inside of some group he would have to create an outside just to feel at home. Even he isn’t as independent as he lets on. Nor are most of the callers to the Ed Schultz show who preface their remarks by proclaiming their independence.
Blumenthal digs deeper into the CNN poll numbers:
Remember the 52 percent of Tea Party activists who initially identify as independent? It turns out that virtually all of them lean Republican. According to CNN, 88 percent of the activists identify or lean Republican, 6 percent identify or lean Democratic and only 5 percent fall into the pure independent category.
The lack of followup questions in much opinion polling clouds the view, leading to the Beltway’s belief that independents have grown to a third of the country since Obama took office. We’ll see just how independent they are this November.
Are Those Cameras On?
Posted by: | CommentsThe Mount Vernon StatementConstitutional Conservatism: A Statement for the 21st CenturyWe recommit ourselves to the ideas of the American Founding. Through the Constitution, the Founders created an enduring framework of limited government based on the rule of law. They sought to secure national independence, provide for economic opportunity, establish true religious liberty and maintain a flourishing society of republican self-government….
Truth, justice, eliminating Social Security, the American way, a noun, a verb and “socialism,” etc. “A bounty of political manifestos” from conservatives, observes the Christian Science Monitor. The Tea Party Patriots’ Contract from America will be revealed at CPAC, reports Time.
“The federal government today ignores the limits of the Constitution, which is increasingly dismissed as obsolete and irrelevant,” says the statement.
About three and a half years late, aren’t they?
Are Those Cameras Off?
Posted by: | Comments
Et tu, Wall Street Journal?
Using letters it obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Wall Street Journal chronicles how GOP critics of the stimulus bill wrote letters supporting stimulus projects in their districts:
Rep. Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican who called the stimulus a “wasteful spending spree” that “misses the mark on all counts,” wrote to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis in October in support of a grant application from a group in his district which, he said, “intends to place 1,000 workers in green jobs.” A spokeswoman for Mr. Ryan said the congressman felt it was his job to provide “the basic constituent service of lending his assistance for federal grant requests.”
Republican Reps. Sue Myrick of North Carolina and Jean Schmidt of Ohio sent letters in October asking for consideration of funding requests from local organizations training workers for energy-efficiency projects.
In November, Ms. Schmidt said in a statement, “It is time to recall the stimulus funds that have not been spent before the Chinese start charging us interest.” Aides to the congresswomen said they had always supported local organizations in their requests for federal funding.
Spokesmen “didn’t respond to a request for comment” crops up a couple of times in the WSJ story. Rachael Maddow was on MSNBC Tuesday night waving these letters letters from various Republicans supporting requests from groups in their districts for stimulus money they voted against. Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC) wrote in support of a National Urban League request:
Funding this application will make it possible for “green jobs training” to benefit 250 participants in greater Charlotte, NC and lead to solar energy related jobs in an area hard hit by unemployment. We have an urgent need for a workforce that is truly prepared to contribute to the “Green” economy.
The entire Alabama delegation signed a letter supporting a $15 million funding request by the Alabama Forestry Commission. Senator Richard Shelby, who called the stimulus bill “the socialist way” during the debate, said “way” once stimulus funds became available.
Uh, yeah … uh, um, possibly
Posted by: | CommentsGoldman’s rigging online polls, now?
From the Telegraph of London on Thursday:
Goldman Sachs is investigating claims that one of its computers was used to rig a public vote on the introduction of a so-called “Robin Hood tax” on bankers.
From Business Insider on Friday:
A few days ago robinhoodtax.com, asked the public to vote on a “tiny” tax on bankers that would donate no more than .05% of each banking transaction to the poor.
[...]
Robin Hood’s security team said that it traced the erroneous votes to two computers, one of which is allegedly registered to Goldman, according to The Telegraph.
From the Digby on Sunday:
Unbelievable. Why in the hell are people entrusting all this power to such a bunch of babies?
On the other hand, if they are forced to pay a .05% tax on transactions it goes without saying that they’ll all hold their breath until they turn blue because it just won’t be worth it to work anymore. And then where will we be?
It seems that somebody at the great vampire squid isn’t too keen on the idea of the banks that brought the world economy to its knees owing anything to the commoners who bailed them out. It’s not a European notion they’d like to see spread to the U.S.
Tell us again how that personal responsibility stuff is supposed to work, how about it?
[h/t Crooks and Liars]
Rocks You Can Reason With
Posted by: | CommentsAvant Gardener and Asheville Citizen-Times Letters to the Editor wrangler, Dave Russell, does his swan song in today’s paper. (Did I Quisinart those metaphors enough for ya?)
While working this job, I have been told — on the same day — that I was a “homophobe,” and one of my neighbors told me I was “in bed with the gays.” In the same week, I’ve been told I was anti-Semitic and so pro-Israel that “it’s not possible for (me) to be fair about the current situation in Palestine.” I’ve been called “anti-God” and “just another born-again (Christian).” And so on.
Could it be that I was just a guy working hard to get as many diverse opinions in the paper as possible? Naaaah ….
Dave is headed to RiverLink, work more closely tied to rocks and water — easier to reason with than LTE writers.
Dave, the AC-T’s loss is RiverLink’s gain.
RNC Winter Meeting: Saving Americans from Themselves
Posted by: | Comments“These poor bastards just didn’t realize they were living in a socialist nightmare …” [timestamp 6:04]
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| The Apparent Trap | ||||
|
||||
Choose a Side
Posted by: | CommentsOver at Daily Kos, Darcy Burner poses this challenge:
Next week, there’s going to be a test in Congress. A real litmus test about whose side various Representatives and Senators are on. It’s a stunningly straightforward bill – only two pages long – that would simply remove the antitrust exemption for health insurers. It would keep insurers from being able to collude and price fix, requiring them to compete in the marketplace for business.
Unlike nearly everything else that’s been done in the last year, this bill is completely uncompromised – no deals have been cut to water down the bill in favor of health insurance companies. It is an unambiguously populist bill, and a clean cut against corporatism. It’s building off of work that key progressives in the House, including Reps. DeFazio, Slaughter, and DeGette, have been teeing up for years.
Assuming the Perriello-Markey bill makes it onto the floor, no one in Congress should be allowed to duck their vote for the insurance companies and against their constituents. Hagan, Shuler and the rest of NC’s delegation should know, as Darcy explains, Vote against this bill, and it means you’re in the pocket of the insurance companies.
As Digby said, “The campaign ads write themselves, don’t they?”
Choose a side. We’ve already chosen.
Love Songs from the Intertubes
Posted by: | Comments
Born Again American from Born Again American on Vimeo.
Your Hooligan Bonus: A chorus that doesn’t begin with a non sequitur.