An Amendment One Fable


From the venerable Aesop:

An Eagle had made her nest at the top of a lofty oak. A Cat, having found a convenient hole, lived with her kittens in the middle of the trunk; and a Wild Sow with her young had taken shelter in a hollow at its foot. The Cat resolved to destroy by her arts this chance-made colony. She climbed to the nest of the Eagle, and said: “Destruction is preparing for you, and for me too. The Wild Sow, whom you may see daily digging up the earth, wishes to uproot the oak, that she may, on its fall, seize our families as food.” Then she crept down to the cave of the Sow and said: “Your children are in great danger; for as soon as you shall go out with your litter to find food, the Eagle is prepared to pounce upon one of your little pigs.” When night came, she went forth with silent foot and obtained food for herself and her kittens; but, feigning to be afraid, she kept a look-out all through the day. Meanwhile, the Eagle, full of fear of the Sow, sat still on the branches, and the Sow, terrified by the Eagle, did not dare to go out from her cave; and thus they each, with their families, perished from hunger.

Those who stir up enmities are not to be trusted.

The occasion for the Aesop is a post at Pam’s House Blend. (The Blend’s version uses foxes instead of cats; you get the idea.) A Maine court document reveals one of the principle aims of the National Organization for Marriage:

According to a court document that was uploaded online, NOM specifically worked to drive a wedge between the black and gay community on the subject of marriage equality:

According to page 11 of this document called Marriage: $20 Million Strategy for Victory:

3. Not a Civil Right Project

The strategic goal of this project is to drive a wedge between gays and blacks – two key democratic constituencies. We aim to find, equip, energize and connect African American spokespeople for marriage; to develop a media campaign around their objections to gay marriage as a civil right; and to provoke the gay marriage base into responding by denouncing these spokesmen and women as bigots. No politician wants to take up and push an issue that splits the base of the party.

NOM has portrayed whatever African-American opposition to marriage equality its spotlighted as spontaneous attempts by leaders and members of the black community to keep its civil rights legacy from supposedly being “tainted” by a comparison to gay equality.

Pretty smart guy, that Aesop.


  1. TJ says:

    It would be great if all supportive SH readers would send emails to anyone connected, to the point they have time for nothing else. What’s some contact info, please?

    I’ve signed petitions, etc., but I have also sent a shout out to several people who are in various working groups of Occupy, and said, that along with corporate abuses, we need to care about our neighbors and friends who have to PAY money to get basic rights. NOONE should have to contribute money to be sure they can live fully with just a basic right as family (other than money for Nintendo, movies, etc., that eat through your budget as any “normal” family does). Children should not have to worry where they will live if a partner dies and the other is a non-biologically related person.

    This whole thing is barbaric and I am ashamed to hear “Christian” folks speak of this as if they are defending our country from some communist invasion. I know my Sunday School classes will not like hearing me this next week.

  2. Jessica Britton says:

    Wonder what the local supporters and fans of NOM, like Kathy Rhodarmer, have to say about this? Too bad we didn’t know about this when they brought their little show to Fairview.