Breaking: Justice Dept. rejects South Carolina voter ID law


From the Washington Post:

The Justice Department on Friday entered the divisive national debate over new state voting laws, rejecting South Carolina’s measure requiring photo-identification at the polls as discriminatory against minority voters.

The decision by Justice’s Civil Rights Division could heighten political tensions over the new laws, which critics say could depress turnout among minorities and others who helped elect President Obama in 2008. A dozen states this year passed laws requiring voters to present state-issued photo identification, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

More from Talking Points Memo:

The decision places the federal government squarely in opposition to the types of voter ID requirements that have swept through mostly Republican-controlled state legislatures.

Officials in DOJ’s Civil Rights Division found a significant racial disparity in the data provided by South Carolina, which must have changes to its election laws precleared under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, because of past history of discrimination. The data demonstrated that registered non-white voters were 20 percent more likely than white voters to lack the specific type of photo identification required to exercise their constitutional rights, according to a letter sent to South Carolina and obtained by TPM.

Because Justice Department lawyers reached the conclusion that South Carolina’s voter ID law would have the effect of suppressing minority voter turnout, they found it was unnecessary to examine whether that was the intent of the legislators who voted for the law. Cases based on intent to discriminate are usually more difficult to prove even though they don’t require the government to prove the effect was discriminatory.

Watch the fallout and howls about Justice Dept. political manipulation over this one.


  1. Tom Sullivan says:

    While I was busy working yesterday, I missed this. United States District Judge Richard Mark Gergel handed down a preliminary injunction blocking several key parts of South Carolina’s anti-immigrant law.

  2. Davyne Dial says:

    It appalls me that certain elements of the Republican Party are so anti progress. I swear they want things returned to the repressive years of Jim Crow, women with no property or voting rights….and cheap labor. It is scary.