Catastrophe and Social Change*
BySo now that the big oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is over and we are onto more important things like hot Russian spy on spy action I would like to take a few moments to reflect back on what we learned from this most recent spill. Other than the fact that most sea birds and fish are not, unfortunately, oil resistant not much. Sure it made great television for a few weeks, lots of attractive news correspondents furthered their careers (I am assuming this, I don’t actually have a TV), We all felt that special bond that only comes from ritually and communally tarring, feathering and then executing some BP executives. We had boycotts and vigils, people cutting their hair and mailing it to the Gulf. We had outrage and then more outrage, conspiracy theories and a glimpse into the corrupt world of our fabulous corporate suzerains government. But other than that what did we have? Oh, we also had suspension of 1st amendment rights, but really the 1st amendment is quaint, and was always a bit overrated.
So what was I talking about again? Oh, yes The Plague! Well, not really The Plague, but rather I was thinking about something I read a few years ago (or maybe I am just making this up–who knows). The general gist is that societies rarely, and I mean rarely, undergo massive societal transformation without being forced to do so by an outside, usually environmental, factor. Par exemple the plague of the calamitous 14th century that killed off anywhere from 30-50% of the population of Europe (perhaps more), and led (forgive my, for the sake of brevity, over simplification) to, among other things, a change in the social order (ie, less people = increased demand for labor = increased value of labor…basically) that is most notably present in the Peasants’ Revolt of 1381 England, and set the stage for the Enlightenment and Industrial Revolution, and helped to overthrow–at least in the mind of the “common man” the absolute authority of the church.
In the case of the French Revolution (again an over simplification) the overthrow of the monarchy would not have been possible without the “aid” of a famine, which finally sent the masses to Versailles to pluck the King and his family from their lives of luxury and ended (well, basically) the hereditary monarchy of Europe’s’ most populous country.
and yadda yadda yadda…
So what does this have to do with the whole Gulf thing? Well, I know we all have hope of something really good coming out of this criminal assault, but I don’t see it coming. Perhaps a few positive changes will come of it but, to be frank, it didn’t kill enough people or negatively impact the lives of enough people for any real dramatic change to come of it. Which is doubly tragic. So sit back and enjoy the onslaught of BS from your corporate masters telling you how everything is going to be alright, and to not adjust your set, keep on buying stuff, all you need to do to “save the planet” is recycle, buy compact fluorescent light-bulbs, and join the Sierra Club.
*This obviously isn’t addressed to all you active and engaged progressives who only buy locally grown/manufactured goods and/or services and drive a Prius, you can go back to your yurts with your rightful feelings of self-satisfaction intact. No, this is addressed to the regular folk who believe in Jesus and work for a living.
12 Comments
July 10th, 2010 at 6:57 pm
“”This obviously isn’t addressed to all you active and engaged progressives who only buy locally grown/manufactured goods and/or services and drive a Prius, you can go back to your yurts with your rightful feelings of self-satisfaction intact. No, this is addressed to the regular folk who believe in Jesus and work for a living.”"
As a journalist & writer, over the years I’ve found, in general, it’s not a good idea to insult one’s audience which you seem to have intentionally done in this rather banal and sophomoric piece. Despite the turgid historical references I find your point elusive.
If your desire is to address believers in Jesus I think you may have chosen the wrong forum, and, as person who works for a living, I wonder what kind of work, real work, you do to earn your living?
Rate this comment:
5
2
July 10th, 2010 at 7:41 pm
Thank you for your valued and insightful criticism. My point(s) shall remain elusive to you.
Rate this comment:
2
2
July 10th, 2010 at 8:03 pm
I would not call this thing “over” by a long shot. Perhaps the story has lost some momentum as a trending topic on internet pop charts, but that doesn’t mean the end. We still have to do these relief wells which are no easy thing and not guaranteed to work. We don’t yet have a clue how hurricanes will spread the devastation inland, the effect of the toxic dispersant, nor the long term consequence of the deep undersea oil plumes and methane concentrations. This may yet turn into the type of disaster that will propel social change. Though I agree it is pretty sad that it is somehow not bad enough to have done so already.
Rate this comment:
3
0
July 12th, 2010 at 12:00 am
First, it’s not a “spill” but a blow out,from BP’s criminal negligence,or government “oversight” agencies doing what they do best, failing miserably at taxpayers tremendous expense. Yes I see big changes on the way, better get your billfold out now, “Cap and Trade” will probably rear it’s ugly head again BP, a promoter of the globalists’ “carbon trading” money making derivative scheme and sponsor of the Copenhagen summit will likely benefit from IPCC’S revenge to be carried out in Mexico soon (what a prop the oil fouled coastline will be!) boy will those taxpayers have to pay!
Rate this comment:
0
2
July 14th, 2010 at 9:06 am
The spill is over???? Revoke this man’s license to blog/write/talk immediately. Now I understand why the usual suspects here are so often incredibly off-base. They’re too lazy to even inform themselves on the issues about which they express opinions.
July 14th, 2010 at 9:11 am
Shad wrote above in a response: “My point(s) shall remain elusive to you.”
Classic. Claim superiority to any who do not share your views and imply that they are too dimwitted to understand your ninja-like mind.
July 14th, 2010 at 9:33 am
SueTwo,
Shad’s opening line is intended, I believe, to satirically remark on the declining media coverage of the spill and the fickle nature of the corporate media.
Rate this comment:
0
0
July 14th, 2010 at 10:47 am
I agree with Gordon, suetwo. The rest of us call what shad wrote “satire”.
Have a look:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire
To think the gulf oil spill is “over” would be incredibly naive. What shadmarsh posted may not win any awards for wit or insight, but try and give him a little credit.
One thing shad did with this post is to highlight that satirical posts, like so many other satirical expressions, often don’t have the effect the writer intended. Either because the writer’s satire is not apparent or, what happens more often, the reader isn’t aware or able to understand the context; thereby, completely missing the point.
Try reading it again, sue, this time without the knee-jerk reaction and generalized insults. You’ve made yourself sound foolish and crass. An apology would be appropriate, too.
Rate this comment:
1
1
July 14th, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Suetwo,
Thank you for your valuable and insightful criticism. My next post will be in crayon.
Rate this comment:
1
1
July 14th, 2010 at 1:13 pm
Thank you for your valuable and insightful criticism. My next post will be in crayon.
Busted! You can’t post in crayo…..
Wait a minute, you’re doing that satire thing again, aren’t ya?
Well, we don’t need no smarty-pants think-ur-so-funny types here and don’t go tellin me that satire has been used by humans in written and spoken form since the time of ancient Greece and Rome. I don’t care!
I also think Colbert is the best of all the conservative pundits; I just don’t get why he’s on Comedy Central and not Fox.
Rate this comment:
2
0
July 15th, 2010 at 9:55 pm
I was wondering if there was a market for my USB-to-Crayola interface.
Rate this comment:
1
0
July 17th, 2010 at 6:39 pm
I share Shad’s concern that the death gusher will fade from the news cycle without spurring meaningful change.
The poisoning of the Gulf which has resulted will play out for decades. The “dead zone” that has been expanding at the outlet of the Mississippi will continue to expand. Fisheries dependent on Gulf nurseries will collapse. “Safe” ways to do deep water drilling will be established …
I think Shad is dead-on. This (so far) has not proved to be a big enough, broad enough, deep enough crisis to spur meaningful change.
My best guess, so far, is that famine will be the trigger for significant social shifts. The one degree rise in global temps over the next decade or two will reduce global food resources by about 10 percent. That’s when social change will hit the fan.
Rate this comment:
2
0