Are Those Cameras Off?
By
Et tu, Wall Street Journal?
Using letters it obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, the Wall Street Journal chronicles how GOP critics of the stimulus bill wrote letters supporting stimulus projects in their districts:
Rep. Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican who called the stimulus a “wasteful spending spree” that “misses the mark on all counts,” wrote to Labor Secretary Hilda Solis in October in support of a grant application from a group in his district which, he said, “intends to place 1,000 workers in green jobs.” A spokeswoman for Mr. Ryan said the congressman felt it was his job to provide “the basic constituent service of lending his assistance for federal grant requests.”
Republican Reps. Sue Myrick of North Carolina and Jean Schmidt of Ohio sent letters in October asking for consideration of funding requests from local organizations training workers for energy-efficiency projects.
In November, Ms. Schmidt said in a statement, “It is time to recall the stimulus funds that have not been spent before the Chinese start charging us interest.” Aides to the congresswomen said they had always supported local organizations in their requests for federal funding.
Spokesmen “didn’t respond to a request for comment” crops up a couple of times in the WSJ story. Rachael Maddow was on MSNBC Tuesday night waving these letters letters from various Republicans supporting requests from groups in their districts for stimulus money they voted against. Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC) wrote in support of a National Urban League request:
Funding this application will make it possible for “green jobs training” to benefit 250 participants in greater Charlotte, NC and lead to solar energy related jobs in an area hard hit by unemployment. We have an urgent need for a workforce that is truly prepared to contribute to the “Green” economy.
The entire Alabama delegation signed a letter supporting a $15 million funding request by the Alabama Forestry Commission. Senator Richard Shelby, who called the stimulus bill “the socialist way” during the debate, said “way” once stimulus funds became available.
8 Comments
February 17th, 2010 at 7:50 am
There is politics and compassion working here. In the best light you could say that the Righties are fighting for the Ideals of their party (read; Anti socialists) but when the bill passes last year, as we all knew it would, they got in line for the money and the good of the public. So they play both sides and hope no one notices the blurred distinction. I think it would be worse if they voted no and then refused the stimulus money and boycotted the ribbon cuttings. Worse for them and any hopes of re-election. I am glad they got behind the various projects at least I can say that I would not be working right now if not for the massive tax credits for renewable energy installations.
February 17th, 2010 at 10:06 am
Speaking of Republicans, did everyone see that Carl Mumpower is thinking of running for Congress again? That would be fun.
BTW, he’s started referring to Obama as “President Boo” in his little podcasts. Get it?
February 17th, 2010 at 11:55 am
Speaking of stimulus monies, see the New York Times: Judging Stimulus by the Numbers Reveals Success
Rate this comment:
1
6
February 17th, 2010 at 5:54 pm
I noticed that he was calling him “Czar Boo”. The “czar” part is obvious, but “Boo”? At first I thought he was pronouncing “BHO” in a strange way. Then I thought “Boo” was short for “Ooga Booga” (which some folks may remember as a quasi-racist Black caricature created by R. Crumb for Zap Comix way back when – and makes sense in this context because, after all, “socialist” is the new “black”), but that’s probably reading too much into it.
So I’m settling on one unifying conclusion: he’s just a douche.
Rate this comment:
2
5
February 17th, 2010 at 6:25 pm
Personally, I don’t think you’re reading too much into it. I emailed the good doctor & asked about “President Boo”, & he said it was indeed the initials ‘BHO’. I pointed out that if it was ‘BHO’, it should be pronounced’bow‘ like ‘Bhopal’, and he said this:
“I’m using a southern Pakistani dialect.”
wink wink.
I have a hard time believing that someone as careful, and dare I say it, crafty about language as Dr. Carl would miss the obvious racial inferences of calling an African-American: ‘Boo’. Maybe I’m wrong…
Rate this comment:
3
4
February 17th, 2010 at 10:01 pm
We should get over the “Republicans bad, Democrats not-so-bad” meme. The two parties are the same. The WORDS are different, but the actions are the same. Our national direction does not change, no matter which party is in charge. We need to create a healthy, sustainable, and equitable LOCAL community. The state and national level politicians don’t give a crap about us, no matter what they say. Get over worrying if Mumpower is calling Obama names or not. It won’t effect your life.
February 18th, 2010 at 12:43 am
If I’m “worrying” about Mumpower calling Obama names, it’s not because of some “Republicans bad, Democrats not-so-bad†meme. It’s because quite often, Dr. Mumpower is sort of a jerk.
And yes, a public figure rubbing salt in the wounds of racial disharmony does indeed affect my life.
Rate this comment:
1
4
February 18th, 2010 at 9:20 am
“President Boo” has just entered the lexicon of record, along with “Donkey Punch” and “Cleveland Steamer”.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=President%20Boo
Rate this comment:
0
2