Feb
04

All Ears #4

By Gordon Smith

Photo 63It’s Thursday, Asheville, and that means it’s time for a fresh installment of All Ears. In an effort to create ease of access to government, I’m opening this thread for all of your Asheville concerns. Whether it’s skyscrapers or road scrapers, leave your observations, visions, rants, and gushy love letters here. Tell your friends that there’s a new way to interact with your City Council.

27 Comments

1

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Thumb up 1 Thumb down 13

2

Nthr fdrl nr NC dscrmntn lw cvrs sxl rnttn, s m sr t s prfctly lgl t dscrmnt gnst htrsxls nd/r ppst sx dmstc prtnrs n NC s Grdn Smth prpss, nd tht dng s wll sv bg mny n chldcr bnfts.
ls Ccl nglcts t ncld th xtrmly mprtnt hsng stts n hs “Cvl Lbrts Rsltn” ctgrs. Rmmbr tht mmgrnts r xtrmly xpnsv t cmmnts d t thr hgh frtlty rts, whl hmlss frtlty rts r thght t b fr lwr, f nly bcs prnts slly qlfy fr pblc hsng nd thrby stp bng hmlss.
-ln Dtmr

n Th, 4 Fb 2010 10:03:07 -0500 “Ccl Bthwll” wrts:
T rcv ml frm Ccl Bthwll,
dd < hrf="mlt:ccl@brvlysss.cm">ccl@brvlysss.cm t yr sf sndr lst.

shvll ctn
Fbrry 2010

——————————————————————————–

Wrkng t Kp shvll Rl!

n Ths ss:
Cty bsnss
Lvng Wgs fr srvc wrkrs
Cvl Lbrts Rsltn
Lrnng crv
Vlntrs Ndd!
Brds nd Cmmssns
CTY F SHVLL CVL LBRTS RSLTN

Cty bsnss

Wth fw frml mtngs nd mr thn dzn brd nd cmmssn mtngs ndr my blt nw, ’v bgn t dvnc sm f th sss rsd drng th lctn cmpgn. Th frst tw tht ’ll b brngng t Cncl nvlv Lvng Wg prvsn fr Cty cntrct srvc wrkrs (jntrl nd lwn mntnnc) nd Cvl Lbrts Rsltn (dscssn blw).

Mnwhl, Brwn Nwmn brght frwrd pln h’s bn wrkng n fr sm tm, nw clld th shvll nrgy ndpndnc nttv, whch s mdld n th Rtrft Ln prgrms ttd lst yr, nd ’m plss t spprt Brwn’s ffrt. W pprvd t n thry nd t’s mvng frwrd wth th Cty Stff nw.

Grdn Smth wll brng Dmstc Prtnr Bnfts t th Cncl ths cmng Tsdy, Fb. 9. Hs pln wld xtnd Cty bnfts t sm-sx prtnrs f cty mplys wh mt crtn crtr. (n mst sch plns thr r rqrmnts f jnt prprty wnrshp r bnkng, r jnt cstdy f chldrn … lgl blgtns tht ndct mnngfl prtnrshp. Ths rls wld hv t b wrkd t.)

lthgh sm thr Nrth Crln cts hv crtd sch plns, cn’t s hw sch pln wld stnd p t lgl chllng. wld thnk tht th sm rls wld hv t pply t ll dmstc prtnrs rgrdlss f sxl rnttn, nd m skng lgl clrfctn frm th NC Schl f Gvrnmnt.

W’v bgn wrk n th Dwntwn Mstr Pln, s wll. ch pc f tht prpsd st f rls wll hv t b xmnd, cdfd nd pprvd vr th nxt fw mnths.

T snd n -ml t ll Cncl mmbrs bt ny ss, clck hr.

——————————————————————————–

Lvng Wgs fr srvc wrkrs

shvll s crtfd Lvng Wg mplyr. ll fll tm wrkrs rcv cmbntn f wgs nd bnfts tht qlfy ndr th stpltns f Jst cnmcs, th lcl lvng wg crtfctn rgnztn. Hwvr, th ppl wh cln th tlts, swp th flrs, tt th grbg nd ct th lwns r nt ncldd bcs thy r cntrct wrkrs.

m dvncng pln tht wld rqr srvc cntrctrs t py ll f thr mplys n cty jbs lvng wg, bgnnng wth th nxt cntrct bds. Stds hv shwn tht Lvng Wg rqrmnts dptd by thr gvrnmnts hv hd vry smll ffct n csts (1 prcnt), nd t sms nrsnbl t m fr r tx mny t bd dwn th vl f lbr n shvll. Tht hrts vryn.

By th wy, ’m ls prt f grp, th shvll thcl Scty, whch hs lnchd BYctt cmpgn. W ncrg ppl t prfrntlly ptrnz Lvng Wg crtfd bsnsss, nd t mk t clr t ths bsnsss tht w r drctng r mny t thm fr tht rsn. s ths grws, w’ll rch t t thr mplyrs t ncrg thm t jn th mvmnt.

——————————————————————————–

Cvl Lbrts Rsltn

Th lngg f th prpsd rsltn (pstd t th bttm f ths nwslttr) s lrgly slf-xplntry. t rflcts brdr vw thn my prvs sggstn tht shvll jn th Snctry Cty mvmnt. ’v bn hlpd by nmbr f ctzns nd lwyrs n frmng ths prpsl, nd t s stll sbjct t chng.

Th prvsn cncrnng mmgrnts s rgnt. stdy by th Plc Fndtn hs shwn tht cts whr lcl plc d nt nfrc fdrl mmgrtn lw r sfr bcs mmgrnts trst th plc. Plc chfs frm Rlgh nd Cry, Nrth Crln hv pblcly ndrsd ths d, s hs th rcntly rtrd chf f th Ls ngls Plc Dprtmnt. n ddtn, s f lcl plc t nfrc fdrl lw s n nfndd mndt. t’s bttr fr s t s r rsrcs n lcl pblc sfty thn t ddrss prblm tht s ntrntnl n scp.

m n th Cty Cncl Pblc Sfty Cmmtt nd wll ntrdc ths msr thr sn. n ddtn wll prsnt t t th Plc Cmmtt f th shvll Bncmb Cmmnty Rltns Cncl (t whch m Cncl lsn).

——————————————————————————–

Lrnng crv

vn ftr 28 yrs n Bncmb Cnty thr’s lt dn’t knw, nd bng n Cncl s grt wy t lrn fst. ’m gttng t s mny mtngs s cn ft nt my schdl nd hv rd mntn f pprwrk.

Prbbly th sngl mst mzng fct ’v bn xpsd t s fr cm n th wht ppr prprd fr Cncl by Cty Mngr Gry Jcksn nd Stff. shvll hs th lrgst prcntg dly ppltn chng f ny lrg cty n Nrth Crln. Smthng lk 40,000 t 45,000 ppl cmmt nt th cty vry dy. r rsdnt ppltn s rnd 75,000. Tht mns tht cty txpyrs r prvdng srvcs nd nfrstrctr t hg pl f nn-txpyrs.

t ls mns tht th “prkng prblm” w hr bt cnstntly s rlly cmmtr prkng prblm, nt shppr prblm r rsdnt prblm. T my wy f thnkng ths ndrscrs th nd fr stllt prkng lts nd mprvd trnst srvc. Gs prcs r lrdy clmng gn, fstr thn th cnmy s rcvrng. W wll lmst crtnly s $3.50 pr glln by th nd f 2010 (nlss th cnmy crshs gn). Tht’s th prc lvl t whch ppl shft thr drvng hbts nd blv dmnd fr trnst wll g p nd dmnd fr dwntwn prkng wll g dwn. W cn’t rn bss t vry nghbrhd n th srrndng cnts, bt w cn crt stllt lts, hpflly wth cprtn frm th Cnty gvrnmnt.

n rltd mttr, ’v lrnd tht dspt th ffr f fr trnst, nt mny Cty mplys r sng th systm. hp t gt by-n frm thr Cncl mmbrs nd Stff n my prpsl t prchs lnr crs s tht mplys wh pt fr trnst wll knw thy hv vhcl vlbl f chld s sck t schl r fr thr rgnt rrnds. (W lrdy hv grntd rd prgrm tht wll py fr cb srvc f wrkrs mss thr bs – thgh tht bck-p s lmst nvr sd.)

——————————————————————————–

Vlntrs Ndd!

D y knt? Cn y d txs? r y cnslr? Cn y tch GD clsss? r y crftr? Cn y hlp smn lrn hw t pply fr jb? Hw t drss fr sccss?

shvll Bncmb Cmmnty Chrstn Mnstry s bt t hlp fll bg gp n srvcs fr th hmlss n shvll. Whl w hv prtty dqt nght shltrs thr hv bn n dy prgrms vlbl. BCCM s rdyng th lnch f wmn’s nd mn’s dy shltr prgrm wth clsss nd cnslng t prvd sgnfcnt hlp fr flks wh r strgglng t gt bck n thr ft.

Mrdth Hmmnd, prgrm crdntr fr th wmn’s prgrm, tld m thy wll nd bt 40 vlntrs (ttl fr bth prgrms), ch pttng n n hr r tw vry wk. Clck n hr nm t -ml hr fr mr nf. Jmmy Vstl, chpln f th Vtrns Rstrtn Qrtrs, cn tll y mr bt th mn’s prgrm.

——————————————————————————–

Brds nd Cmmssns

FY: ’m n tw Cncl sb-cmmtts, th Fnnc Cmmtt (whch vlts ll prpsls whch wll hv sgnfcnt ffct n bdgt mttrs) nd Pblc Sfty (whch vrss Plc, Fr nd mrgncy Srvcs).

m Cncl lsn t th shvll Bncmb Cmmnty Rltns Cncl, th Fr Hsng thrty, th Rgnl r Qlty Brd, th Tr Cmmssn, th Rcrtn Brd, nd th Sstnblty dvsry Cmmtt n nrgy nd th nvrnmnt (SC). vnts

——————————————————————————–

CTY F SHVLL CVL LBRTS RSLTN

WHRS: Th Cty f shvll ffrms ts strng spprt fr th fndmntl cnstttnl rghts f vry prsn nd rcgnzs tht th prsrvtn f cvl lbrts s ssntl t th wll-bng f dmcrtc scty; nd th Cty f shvll s prd f ts lng nd dstngshd trdtn f prtctng th cvl lbrts nd ffrdng ql prtctn f th lw t ll prsns n th Cty, wh ncld dvrs ppltn f mny rcs, rlgns, nd ntnl nd thnc rgns, ncldng mmgrnts, trsts nd stdnts, whs cntrbtns t th cmmnty’s cnmy, cltr nd cvc chrctr r vst nd mprtnt;

WHRS: Th Cty f shvll ppss msrs tht sngl t ndvdls fr lgl scrtny r nfrcmnt ctvty bsd n thr rc, skn clr, ntnl r thnc rgn, sxl rnttn, dsblty, rlgs r pltcl pnn r ctvty, r mmgrtn stts.

WHRS: Th Cty f shvll ppss ny ffrts t trnsfr fdrl mmgrtn rspnsblty t stt nd lcl ffcls, snc ths prpsls tx r lrdy vrbrdnd plc dprtmnt nd dmg rltnshps wth mmgrnt cmmnts; crmnlzng .S. ctzns, ths wh wrk wth nd fr mmgrnts nd mmgrnts thmslvs, s nt vbl lng-trm sltn t cncrns vr mmgrtn nd wll cntn sprtng fmls whl prvntng cvc prtcptn by ll prsns;

WHRS: Th Cty f shvll blvs tht thr s n nhrnt cnflct btwn ntnl scrty nd th prsrvtn f lbrty bt tht mrcns cn b bth sf nd fr;

WHRS: Th Cty f shvll wshs t ply ldng rl n th prtctn f cvl lbrts nd t cnsstntly prmt tlrnc nd rspct fr ll prsns, mmgrnts, vstrs, stdnts, nd ctzns lk, nd rcgnzs tht nmbr f thr jrsdctns n Nrth Crln nd n th ntd Stts hv nctd plcs r lws t prtct th cvl lbrts f ll prsns rgrdlss f rc, skn clr, ntnl r thnc rgn, sxl rnttn, dsblty, rlgs r pltcl pnn r ctvty, r mmgrtn stts.

THRFR, B T RSLVD BY TH CTY F SHVLL tht:

Sctn 1. Th Cty f shvll phlds th cnstttnl rghts nd cvl lbrts f ny nd ll prsns nd t s th plcy f th Cty f shvll t prtct gnst dscrmntn n th bss f rc, skn clr, ntnl r thnc rgn, sxl rnttn, dsblty, rlgs r pltcl pnn r ctvty, r mmgrtn stts.

Sctn 2. Cty f shvll ffcrs nd mplys shll rfrn frm rcl prflng, r sng rc, skn clr, ntnl r thnc rgn, sxl rnttn, dsblty, rlgs r pltcl pnn r ctvty, r mmgrtn stts s fctr n slctng ndvdls, chck pnts r rs f twn t sbjct t nvstgtry ctvts;

Sctn 3. Cty f shvll ffcrs nd mplys shll rfrn frm nggng n th vdtpng r thr srvllnc f ndvdls r grps bsd n thr prtcptn n prtctd ctvts sch s th prctc f rlgn r pltcl dvccy;

Sctn 4. Cty f shvll ffcrs nd mplys shll rfrn frm cllctng r mntnng nfrmtn bt th pltcl, rlgs r scl vws, ssctns r ctvts f ny ndvdl, ssctn, rgnztn, crprtn, bsnss r prtnrshp nlss sd nfrmtn s drctly rltd t n nvstgtn f crmnl cndct tht s bsd n rsnbl sspcn.

Sctn 5. Cty f shvll ffcrs nd mplys shll rfrn frm prtcptng n th nfrcmnt f fdrl mmgrtn lws r nttvs sch s th Trrrsm nfrmtn nd Prvntn Systm (TPS), tht ncrg mmbrs f th gnrl pblc t spy n thr nghbrs, cllgs nd cstmrs, r th .S. mmgrtn nd Cstms nfrcmnt (C), tht drv wdg btwn th mmgrnt cmmnty nd th lcl plc wh nd t prtct th wlfr f ll r rsdnts; n dprtmnt, gncy, cmmssn, ffcr r mply f th Cty f shvll shll s Cty fnds r rsrcs t ssst n th nfrcmnt f fdrl mmgrtn lws, r t gthr, s r dssmnt th mmgrtn stts nfrmtn f ndvdls n th Cty f shvll.

B T LS RSLVD tht th prvsns f ths Rsltn shll b svrbl, nd f ny prvsn f ths Rsltn s dclrd ncnstttnl by crt f cmptnt jrsdctn, th vldty f th rmndr shll nt b ffctd.

B T FRTHR RSLVD tht ths Rsltn shll b frwrdd t ll Cty f shvll lw nfrcmnt gncs nd t vry dprtmnt, gncy, cmmssn, ffcr nd mply f th Cty f shvll nd t r lcl, stt nd fdrl lgsltv dlgtns n bhlf f th rsdnts f th Cty f shvll.

Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2

3

Alan,

I’m advocating domestic partnership benefits for same-sex couples in order to recruit and retain quality employees and to bring basic fairness to our city employees.

Same-sex couples are prohibited from getting married in NC, so they are not able to access spousal benefits. Opposite sex couples have the option of marrying, so they are able to access spousal benefits.

Thumb up 17 Thumb down 0

4

Ralph,

I’m for all of the initiatives you propose. Though I’m thinking of asking the County Commissioners for an eternal winter over one of their residents.

Thumb up 2 Thumb down 15

5

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Thumb up 0 Thumb down 12

6

I was wondering why the APD needed ANOTHER armored vehicle (at $303,000) http://www.ashevillenc.gov/WorkArea/showcontent.aspx?id=20420 (and don’t tell us because it’s “free” with Homeland Security $$$)

Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0

7

There is a BIG push to rezone the old Naval Reserve site on Merrimon Ave. to allow 60 plus units of “affordable housing”. A good cause but way too big a project for the already overcrowded area. Current zoning allows for 30-32 units without change. Is all the old zoning wrong or do we just zone differently when we like the developers? Please sign the petition to keep the current zoning in place! PLEASE!!!

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/785-merrimon-ave/

Rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

8

Thanks for commenting, Rob. I’ve gotten emails against and in favor of this project.

It’s the sense of this Council that promoting density on our transportation corridor will protect open spaces and offer a range of housing options adjoining main transit routes.

The alternative to density on our corridors is continued flight to the County or incursion into our well-established neighborhoods. Our tax base problems won’t be solved by maintaining the status quo.

I’m in favor of the Larchmont development on Merrimon for these reasons and more.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4

9

Thank for your comments Gordon, I do not have a problem with density loading but this particular site with the N. Asheville Fire Department 20 feet from the Larchmont gate? This speaks to safety when they cannot get to your burning house. The post office may be doomed anyway but block the fire trucks and the issue might be fatal!

Rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3

10

The Fire Dept. has given their o.k. to the project. My assumption is that they would be very quick to ask for adjustments to the site plan if there were any difficulties.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

11

I would love to see that in writing with a name attached to it.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3

12

I’ll see what I can do.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

13

Gordon,

About the MHO project. Cindy Weeks, who I’m sure is a tireless worker, is the head of MHO, who is proposing the project. She is also an appointee of the City of Asheville, as head of its Planning and Zoning Board. She is also an agent of the county for this project, the owner of the property.

So, she is representing the city, county, and MHO in an attempt to purchase the land from the county, have the rezoning approved by the city, and build a structure that investors will make a profit off of.

It is my belief that there is a conflict of interest in regards to that project. I do not know Cindy, and I am not accusing her of being a bad person, but I am a little uncomfortable in regards to one person representing everyone.

I’m curious as to what you mean by “incursion into our well established neighborhoods”. I don’t know if you’ve been through the area, but the development would be going up in well established neighborhood of single family residences. The introduction of 60 units as your next door neighbor doesn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense, especially when they can build 30 as is.

Can you provide a substantial justification as to why it should be 60 units as opposed to the 30 that the comprehensive zoning plan currently allows for?

Thanks.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

14

Thanks for commenting, John. The development will be on the old Naval Reserve site over the Post Office on Merrimon. It’s a big lot on an urban corridor. I understand that there’s a neighborhood adjacent to it, and MHO has had community meetings to address concerns.

This city needs affordable housing, and we need it yesterday. If we’re not going to add density to our urban corridors, where will we do it? 60 units of affordable housing is twice as many as 30. Without other developers executing projects right now, it’s critical that we add to our affordable housing on our urban corridors whenever possible.

Cindy’s certainly a go-getter, and she’s always been completely above-board and transparent. I have no concerns.

I’m a big fan of this Larchmont project, and I hope to see many more like it. Without affordable housing options near the city center, we’re going to lose open space, add traffic, add pollution, and lose diversity.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

15

Jim,

We decided not to ask for the armored vehicle.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

16

Sorry I meant to give you a thumbs up but I can’t change it now.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

17

Gordon,

The only meeting MHO had for the community that I was aware of was the one where they showed up, and informed the community as to what they would be building. When asked if the building would be made any smaller, one of the spokespersons replied that it wouldn’t be profitable for the investors if it dropped below 60 units. So, to some of us, it seems that the only driving need for rezoning is to make it profitable. No one understands why there couldn’t be a profitable venture at 30 units.

The county approached MHO in May, and MHO notified the community in Nov. They could have been more forthcoming in seeking community involvement for design purposes.

Furthermore, UNC’s School of Government says that spot zoning is illegal: http://tinyurl.com/ygrhyyq. Considering that there are no other heavy urban residential areas within miles of this small 2 acre area, why wouldn’t this count as spot zoning?

On top of all that, there is only one bus route to the site that comes once an hour. Lengthy delays in bus service pushes people to use cars, which then increases traffic in the already congested area.

I don’t know if you’ve been to the neighborhood, but installing sidewalks would squeeze already tight streets that were not built for today’s traffic demands.

Realizing the significant need for workforce housing, we’re all too happy to see a 30 unit structure go up. 120 or so people in a 60 units on two acres will over stress the area’s infrastructure.

No offense, but the “well 60 is more than 30″ argument seems like an arbitrary defense. If we need more, why stop at 60? Why not do 120? 200? Some people think we need more WalMarts, why don’t we have more of those? The key is finding the right balance. This area was zoned the way it was for a reason, and I am not sure I have heard a compelling reason as to why it should be rezoned.

Your job’s not easy, thanks for doing it.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

18

Gordon is on City Council (I believe) and everyone else who is supposed to be a representative of the public, that I have had dialog with, are signed on to this project 100%. The fact that the public has not had a chance to weigh in seems unimportant to them. I can only conclude this project was approved before it was offered. It was begun in May but nobody outside of the inner circle was even aware of it until at least the middle of December. The consensus of people believe “its a done deal”. The committees that make the zoning and approvals are peppered with people either proposing or connected to the project and it seems their decisions have been made. Gordon is sold, is everyone?

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

19

I am not interested in making anyone mad but an not afraid as so many to be seen as “politically incorrect”. It seems that this project is really more concerned with bringing federal grant dollars into our impoverished state (at any cost). With unemployment at about 10% I doubt this is going to fix that problem. When the good jobs leave, the more qualified workers will take lesser jobs (some at minimum wage).
At the MHO public meeting I attended, the concerns raised were not answered, they were crushed under the weight of a Goliath Corporation and the questioners were called “elitists” or “nimbys” and were accused of being against the affordable housing movement, etc. I qualify to live in these housing developments and may actually move in but this on creates an unsafe condition due to its size. Traffic and Fire Department access are irrelevant. Nobody will consider the objections (it seems), the farm is SOLD and the cattle are slated for slaughter.
The process has NOT been transparent, when I tried to get information from the County and City about this project I got “who are you and what is your business?” Then I got NO information. People I spoke with after the meeting were AFRAID to ask a question. AFRAID? Gordon has declared absolutely for this project, he has not even heard the side of those who may question it, has he? If he has then when and where? I know people right now who have questions and real legitimate concerns and have not spoken to anyone about them, is anyone here to represent them?

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

20

My friends tell me when I get angry it just makes it easy to dismiss what I say (they say I make good points). I feel passionate about a project that directly affects me and endangers my family. I am not sure anyone listened when I was calm and provided documentation for the points I made and that is frustrating. Still, sorry if this offends anyone:(

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

21

I should have noticed the MHO advertisement on the page when I first came here, OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPs. Well I guess the public really does not have any say or rights when all the deals were cooked up before the public knew. Gotta love it! Welcome to Russia er I mean America in 2010. Transparency in City Government? Wonder what the officials in Raleigh and Washington who oversee this area of Federal Grants will say about this process?

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

22

Oh, come on.

MHO does great work all over the city. There’s no deals “cooked up”. Next thing you know I’ll get accused of being part of the great Animal Rights conspiracy.

Disagreeing with me is fine, but accusing me of dishonesty and nontransparency is downright silly.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

23

when you are a representative of ther people and the decisions are made before people can provide input, where would you go with that? You provided your support for the project before any of the meetings on the subject, what am I to believe? Why can’t I call the county or city and get any information? I agree that MHO does great work but does that mean anything they propose will be immediately approved? What about the people that are too intimidated at their presentations to even ask a question, do they deserve to be represented or not?

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

24

Rob,

The advertisement for Mountain Housing Opportunities represents no conflict of interest, if that’s what you’re implying. As a service to the non-profits of Asheville and as a way to strengthen our community, Scrutiny Hooligans puts up these ads for free — and it was my decision, not Gordon’s.

Anyone having a non-profit they’d like to promote can email me directly at mullermail@mac.com.

MM

Rate this comment: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

25

I appreciate knowing that the ads are free for non-profits you approve. I did not see that anywhere on the site until you made the statement. Thanks for the info Michael Muller.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

26

Just wanted you to see the updates/ neighbors comments on the Larchmont project at the old Naval Reserve site 785 Merrimon Ave.

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/785-merrimon-ave/

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

27

The reason for the North Asheville pushback is the MHO project’s density: 60 units (three stories) on 2.3 acres. But there is more than numbers at work. People relate to what they know. Our neighborhood points of reference for comparable footprints are the old Gracelyn Gardens Apts. (40 units/3 acres) or the three-story University Place Apts. (24 units/2.5 acres).

Edgewood Rd. residents organized and fought University Place before it was built ten years ago and (I think) forced the developer to scale it back to 24 units from the original proposal. The Naval Reserve project pushback is not without precedent.

Furthermore, the neighborhood recently watched as the supposed “two-story” Carolina First Bank building (674 Merrimon, across from Asheville Pizza and Brewing) soared to nearly 40 ft over Merrimon Ave., dwarfing surrounding structures.

Rate this comment: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1