Wednesday Potpourri
By
There’s exciting doings all over the place, and this Councilman/Counselor can’t find time to properly blog about it all. Â Who wants to pay me to do this stuff full time?
The irascible ThunderPig reports that Dan Eichenbaum (R-Tetley), founder of the area’s 9/12 group, won another straw poll of Republicans, this time in Cherokee County. Dr. Dan hopes to face Heath Shuler this November.
Speaking of Heath Shuler, he closed the deal on the North Shore Road. That means Swain County will receive $52 million in compensation for a road never completed. Â Somehow Charles Taylor, who was an Appropriations Committee member for years, couldn’t ever get it done. Kudos, Congressman Shuler.
In other Congressional race news, Virginia Foxx, the woman who always has one eye on the kookier wing of the GOP, has drawn a challenger in NC-05. “Billy Kennedy, a Watauga County talk radio host and community leader, will formally announce his candidacy on February 8 for the U.S. House of Representatives, 5th District of North Carolina. The “Billy Kennedy Caravan†will stretch from Boone to Raleigh that day, with stops in Wilkesboro and Winston-Salem.”
Ellie Johnston attended the Copenhagen climate conference and has a thorough narrative of her experience there. Excerpt:
The political outcome that came out of the conference, the Copenhagen Accord, realizes none of our demands and is characterized by a weak pledge and review framework for key mitigation targets that was left empty of commitments as leaders flew home. As news of the Copenhagen Accord spread in Copenhagen, stories on how it was brokered emerged to provide tinder for a wild fire of political drama and finger pointing.
Patsy Keever launched a gorgeous new website in her run for NC House. Go check it out. If you’re ready for representation that puts people first, please drop her some coin or a few volunteer hours. She’s worth it.
Sirius.B is going to rock Jack of the Wood this Friday.
The Help Haiti Heal concert is at the White Horse in Black Mountain on Saturday and Sunday. This will likely be the musical event of the year.
The amazing crew from the WNC Disc Golf club “will be holding a public input meeting Saturday Feb 6th from 5pm to 7pm at the Montford Recreation Center 34 Pearson Drive Asheville, NC 28801. The purpose of this meeting is to gather public input regarding the installation of a new Nature Trail Disc Golf Course atRichmond Hill.” The Disc Golf club is volunteering to do all the installation and maintenance work on the new course on their own nickel. Go tell them you love them.
35 Comments
February 3rd, 2010 at 2:31 pm
Great story on Sirius.B’s latest incarnation at Mtn. X>.
Rate this comment:
0
3
February 3rd, 2010 at 2:46 pm
What day is this?
February 3rd, 2010 at 2:56 pm
AvlTEDx2010 is gearing up
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:09 pm
“… Th rscbl ThndrPg…”
h cm n, Grdn. Bbby s n f th mst ld bck, nc, nflppbl ppl knw. Y’r wy ff bs n tht n.
Nw f y wnt ‘rscbl’ ’ll gv y Brnr nd Yltn … bt Bbby?
C’mn, b rl.
February 3rd, 2010 at 5:13 pm
“… Tht mns Swn Cnty wll rcv $52 mlln n cmpnstn fr rd nvr cmpltd. …”
Smll rcmpns fr prms brkn nd gnrtns dshnrd.
February 3rd, 2010 at 9:48 pm
U.N. Copenhagen agreement: Like a third rate horror movie no matter how many times this agenda has been proven to be a politically motivated false premise based on fabricated “evidence” the beast keeps getting up accompanied by the “obama zombies” howling GLOBAL WARMING. Will the HERO show up for the next election or will the Republocrats continue their reign of terror?
February 3rd, 2010 at 10:36 pm
For additional information about the 2-day Benefit Concert for the work in Haiti this coming weekend, please visit our website
http://www.helphaitihealbenefit.com
thanks
don talley
February 3rd, 2010 at 11:11 pm
Jim,
Are you a climate change denier? Whoulda thunk it?!
February 3rd, 2010 at 11:54 pm
So Ralph you are in favor of reparations too? who da thunk it. First the socialist parking thing, and now this…are you sure you’re not red?
February 4th, 2010 at 7:43 am
Shd, hv y rd ny hstry bt wht hppnd n Wstrn Nrth Crln n th 30s nd 40s?
Ppl wh lvd n th mntn vllys tht bcm prt f th Grt Smky Mntn Ntnl Prk wr rmvd frm thr lnd wth lttl r n rcmpns. Rd bt th Ctlch n Hywd Cnty s n xmpl f th hghhndd ctns f r wn gvrnmnt.
Th cm Wrld Wr nd th Tnnss Vlly thrty. Svrl TWNS n Swn Cnty (nd Grhm) wr pt ndr wtr n th rlr frts by th gvrnmnt sng wrtm thrty, gn wth lttl r n rcmpns t th ppl dsplcd. Bt th gvrnmnt, t tk sm f th dg ff ths rwnss f pwr, prmsd th ppl thr wld b rd blt t th Nrthshr r.
N, m NT n fvr f rprtns (tht’s wht th 52 mlln s). m n fvr f th gvrnmnt kpng t’s prmss. dn’t knw why, thy hv n xcptnlly pr rcrd n tht rspct. sk ll th Ntv mrcn trbs. sk ll th mntn flk ynkd frm frms thy hd hld fr gnrtns.
Fr prkng s nt sclst, t’s jst prk n rtrn fr shppng dwntwn – tkng ppl’s lnd nd lvlhd nd nt kpng yr prmss, nw THT s sclst.
February 4th, 2010 at 7:45 am
Grdn, t wld b nc t hv n dtng fclty whr w cld crrct typs.
February 4th, 2010 at 8:16 am
It would be nice, Ralph, but it’s nagahappen.
February 4th, 2010 at 8:35 am
If climate change wasn’t happening North America would be under an ice cap, or the “little ice age” would not have happened,but can the U.N. TAX and supranational government structure change that? This is a naked grab for power by an unelected, unaccountable group of internationalists using science (or lack of) as a trojan horse to bring about world government.
February 4th, 2010 at 9:54 am
Jim,
Yikes. You’re a scary one.
February 4th, 2010 at 10:31 am
At the United Nations Bretton Woods Monetary Conference back in 1944, the three-pronged economic framework for a fully integrated world was established. The U.S. Senate confirmed two of the three: the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The U.S. did not pass the International Trade Commission, the precursor to the World Trade Organization. In its place, 23 countries ratified the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. Between 1948 and December, 1994 when GATT/WTO was finally passed by a lameduck Congress, fourteen GATT “Rounds” had been held, including the Dillion, Kennedy, Tokyo, and Uruguay Rounds. At each of these meetings further concessions were made in the negotiations of trade tariffs. Major categories for trade include telecommunications, maritime transport services, Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), Financial Services, the environment, competition policies, government procurement, technology, labour, agricultural reform, and textiles. The GATT is more than 26,000 pages long and no single article could ever explain or comprehend what this global agreement really does or means. This massive Agreement whose intent it is to break down ALL of the TRADING BARRIERS IN THE WORLD, will change everything. Given the above negotiations and the length of the GATT document, it should be noted that trade is not “free.” GATT/WTO represents a complete dismantling of commerce and manufacturing as presently known. (WTO Press Release on Financial Services, December 9-13, 1996)
February 4th, 2010 at 5:43 pm
So, Ralph, Socialism is–to you anyway– a catch all phrase for things you don’t like, not an actual ideology. Thanks for clearing that up (and for the history lesson, as a Yankee interloper I am incapable of understanding or appreciating mountain culture and history).
ps,I hope you won’t be cashing anyone of those Socialist SS checks anytime in the future.
February 4th, 2010 at 7:41 pm
Why d y wnt t rg, Shd? dn’t gt scl scrty, nt ld ngh. Y’r th n qtng vrythng t sclsm, qt t t bd dcsns md by stpd ppl n gvrnmnt frm bth prts vr prd f tm nd wh fl t thnk t fnd smpl sltns fr smpl prblms.
s t y bng Ynk ntrlpr “ncpbl f ndrstndng r pprctng mntn cltr nd hstry” – nvr dsgr wth mn wh knws hmslf.
Hwvr, f y wld lk t cr yr slf-dmttd gnrnc f mntn wys, mght sggst tht “r Sthrn Hghlndrs” by Hrc Kphrt s strtng pnt – spclly th lxndr Bks dtn wth th Frwrd by m.
February 4th, 2010 at 9:42 pm
So, basically yes is what you mean.
February 4th, 2010 at 9:57 pm
Shd, mn nthng nd vrythng … nt ‘ys’ nd nt ‘n’ … bt mstly ndffrnc t yr flwd prcptn.
February 4th, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 4th, 2010 at 10:34 pm
Potpourri it is…
When the TVA was first proposed, it was attacked in the same way health reform is being attacked–but it brought electricity to rural areas would have been ignored by private power companies. Now the descendants of those people can use that electric power to complain about big government…
Historical correction: The people were not removed with “little or no recompense” to create the Smokies. They were paid the going rate for their land–but not for their emotional connection to the land (how does one put a price on that?). Some were given the option of remaining there until they died.
February 4th, 2010 at 10:48 pm
So you wont be accepting Social Security then?
February 4th, 2010 at 10:54 pm
Jim,
A patient is given a series of lab tests by a group of doctors–the majority of the tests are postive for illness but several are negative because of testing errors. Should the patient assume that all the tests are wrong and not seek treatment?
February 4th, 2010 at 11:12 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 4th, 2010 at 11:26 pm
I tried to read it but my tinfoil hat kept interfering with my wireless connection.
February 4th, 2010 at 11:58 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
February 5th, 2010 at 12:27 am
not really, I’ve got callouses.
February 5th, 2010 at 6:34 am
Well, didn’t have time to read that article in depth, but I did discover that my 9mm won’t save me from climate crooks, also that Uncle Sam does his “business” into a hollow stump.
February 5th, 2010 at 9:36 am
http://finance.yahoo.com/focus-retirement/article/108747/next-in-line-for-a-bailout-social-security?mod=fidelity-readytoretire
February 6th, 2010 at 9:26 am
Yes, Jim. I read. A few emails, etc. prove nothing in light of the larger volume of evidence.
If you were to look into other fields of science you’d find that researchers had done similar things. It’s part of the process for researchers to take jabs at each other, try to discredit each other or simply make jokes while researching. Mistakes with equipment and procedure also occur–but it doesn’t disprove the larger body of research.
What about the answer to my question?
February 6th, 2010 at 1:12 pm
A patient is given a series of tests. A group of doctors, some of whom have a financial interest in recommending their cure, others only somewhat agree, with reservations which are not noted by the others, many disagree that the illness even exists argueing the symptoms are within the natural variability of human health, analyze the results. The test results contrary to the favored diagnosis are excluded and destroyed. All efforts to determine the methodology of the small number of doctors testing is thwarted, and any doctors disagreeing are ridiculed and shut out of peer reviewed medical journals by the testers’ influence with the journals This is the REAL analogy. I believe, at least the patient should get other opinions, and if necessary, file malpractice claims about the deliberate distortions by the doctors, before agreeing to any treatment.
February 6th, 2010 at 2:06 pm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24269996/100-Reasons-Why-Climate-Change-Is-Not-Man-Made-Jim-McConalogue-The-European-Journal
February 6th, 2010 at 10:19 pm
nice, you’ve really put some effort in to expanding a simple analogy.
All doctors (unless a charity clinic) have a financial interest recommending their cure.
..meanwhile the patient’s health continues to decline. The indiviual is led astray by nonmedical persons (with their own self interests) and does not seek medical care. Eventually the patient dies from the illness. Thus it is proven that the majority diagnosis was correct.
The moral to this charming bedtime story? A couple of well meaning doctors “financial interests” could have been met and the patient would have LIVED.
Jim McConalogue is not a scientist, he’s a conservative political analyst with his own interests…
February 7th, 2010 at 12:04 pm
Your analogy and interpretation really only represents your world view and opinion, and not addressing the deliberate corruption of science, ie: selective exclusion of evidence damaging to the “official” narrative, using “evidence” not proven (or even derived) scientifically to promote a previously adopted political agenda. There is plenty of scientists researching within their field of expertise that have identified not just errors, but deliberate misrepresentations of data, some who were contributing authors to the IPCC report, withdrawing their support after having their chapters rewritten to support claimsnot in evidence. Jim McConalogue doesn’t have to be a meteorologist to recognize a person claiming it is raining is actually peeing on his leg.
February 7th, 2010 at 4:40 pm
Rspndng t th dgrssn frm hr:
< hrf="http://scrtnyhlgns.s/2010/02/05/ssdpb/" rl="nfllw">http://scrtnyhlgns.s/2010/02/05/ssdpb/
n lk hr:
< hrf="http://scrtnyhlgns.s/2010/02/05/cty-cncl-gnd-2-9-10/" rl="nfllw">http://scrtnyhlgns.s/2010/02/05/cty-cncl-gnd-2-9-10/
shld shw y tht cmmnt n mny sbjcts nd cn nd d ftn nd rlvntly cmmnt n vry gnd tm n cncl r cmmssn mtng, nthr f whch hs vr ddrssd vrppltn. n fct th nd t py fr mncpl cntrcptn mks m fscl cnsrvtv n thr spndng tms ths ftn sdng wth ppl wh wld nvr sd wth sgnfcnt mncpl cntrcptn spndng.
Tht’s n ddtn t th fct tht mncpl cntrcptn cn sv th wrld whr vgtrnsm cn’t, mkng mn th rght nt nd Stwrd Dvd’s th wrng nt.
Pls y rrlvntly thrtn t cnsr m fr cmmntng n sbjct n thrd hghly rlvnt t tht sbjct. t ws Mk nd hs thrts tht strtd th dgrssn, nt m.
Rate this comment:
2
0