You will all be _amazed_ how fast that little monster will be stealing money from your wallet off the nightstand, getting drunk and joyriding with your car, and throwing wild parties with education reform and tort reform when your back is turned.
The “first steps” narrative is being used to make us swallow this piece of shite giveaway to big insurance. It will NOT be “fixed” or improved later! You can put money on that. But….if you’d rather keep your fantasy alive a while longer, feel free.
Our government is broken, but, man, the bread and circuses business is booooming!
Yes, but only 283 people were paying attention, so I figure I could use it again. On a side note:I’m surprised my proposal of mandating abortions for all non-white pregnant ladies as a means of lowering health care costs hasn’t caught on with more politicians.
And as for your proposal mandating abortions for all (poor) non-white pregnant women: it will not only lower Health Care Costs but Public Education and Social Services costs as well (a quick D&C is pennies compared with a lifetime of taxpayer-funded doctors, teachers, welfare benefits, and prison). And, all this says nothing about the tremendous impact that fewer (poor) non-white children would have on the environment, as we all know that (poor) non-white people have a much higher carbon footprint, given their dietary choices (methane!), inability to afford hybrid automobiles, and whatnot.
Perhaps it would be more appropos to say “Miniature American flags for some, Abortions for others!†Or not. Maybe. I don’t know. What about the exclamation point? Seems a little in-your-face.
“Cartoon would have been more accurate if the baby were drawn with head trauma and a black eye. ”
Paul -V-
paragraph 6, section a641 of the Editorial Cartoonist Code of Behavior—
“at no time are you to be accurate, or even hint at the doctrine of accuracy, in either your published work or your spoken word. If you are desirous of “accurateâ€, get thee to the Weather Channel.”
I’m surprised my proposal of mandating abortions for all non-white pregnant ladies as a means of lowering health care costs hasn’t caught on with more politicians.
Shad, a “tea bag” group in Waycross was praying for “mid-term” abortions and adopted a similar strategy. Just remember, if gun control means hitting your target, then legislation control does too. So be careful where you point that proposal of yours: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0uxURKIFqU
That is a correct reading of paragraph 6, section a641, Barry. It goes on, in section a642, however, to state that editorial cartooning should be taken as “opinion”, (noun),– a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. Hence, the editorial part.
Not unlike 99.5% of the written postings that you can find on any website, anywhere in cyberspace.
Nice eye, too.
19 Comments
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:59 am
Meh.
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:07 am
You will all be _amazed_ how fast that little monster will be stealing money from your wallet off the nightstand, getting drunk and joyriding with your car, and throwing wild parties with education reform and tort reform when your back is turned.
Rate this comment:
1
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:33 am
Now that was funny, John
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:28 am
Anybody who quotes “The Simpsons” is okay in my book!
I swear I’m voting for you next time, Shad!
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:10 am
Cartoon would have been more accurate if the baby were drawn with head trauma and a black eye.
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 am
There’s a late-term abortion joke in here somewhere, but even I’m not that tasteless. Where’s Roat when you need him?
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:35 pm
An Alabama Blue Dog comes out of the closet:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30896.html
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 1:19 pm
Just as long a nothing gets on the furniture . . .
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Badoom-pah!
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Then David you will be glad to know that the slogan for my next campaign will be: “Abortions for some, miniature American flags for others!”
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:18 pm
The “first steps” narrative is being used to make us swallow this piece of shite giveaway to big insurance. It will NOT be “fixed” or improved later! You can put money on that. But….if you’d rather keep your fantasy alive a while longer, feel free.
Our government is broken, but, man, the bread and circuses business is booooming!
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:20 pm
Shad, I thought that was the slogan for your last campaign.
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:28 pm
Yes, but only 283 people were paying attention, so I figure I could use it again. On a side note:I’m surprised my proposal of mandating abortions for all non-white pregnant ladies as a means of lowering health care costs hasn’t caught on with more politicians.
Rate this comment:
1
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Good point.
And as for your proposal mandating abortions for all (poor) non-white pregnant women: it will not only lower Health Care Costs but Public Education and Social Services costs as well (a quick D&C is pennies compared with a lifetime of taxpayer-funded doctors, teachers, welfare benefits, and prison). And, all this says nothing about the tremendous impact that fewer (poor) non-white children would have on the environment, as we all know that (poor) non-white people have a much higher carbon footprint, given their dietary choices (methane!), inability to afford hybrid automobiles, and whatnot.
Perhaps it would be more appropos to say “Miniature American flags for some, Abortions for others!†Or not. Maybe. I don’t know. What about the exclamation point? Seems a little in-your-face.
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:02 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=386JprXXU90
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:46 pm
“Cartoon would have been more accurate if the baby were drawn with head trauma and a black eye. ”
Paul -V-
paragraph 6, section a641 of the Editorial Cartoonist Code of Behavior—
“at no time are you to be accurate, or even hint at the doctrine of accuracy, in either your published work or your spoken word. If you are desirous of “accurateâ€, get thee to the Weather Channel.”
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Shad, a “tea bag” group in Waycross was praying for “mid-term” abortions and adopted a similar strategy. Just remember, if gun control means hitting your target, then legislation control does too. So be careful where you point that proposal of yours: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0uxURKIFqU
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:27 pm
That is a correct reading of paragraph 6, section a641, Barry. It goes on, in section a642, however, to state that editorial cartooning should be taken as “opinion”, (noun),– a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. Hence, the editorial part.
Not unlike 99.5% of the written postings that you can find on any website, anywhere in cyberspace.
Nice eye, too.
Rate this comment:
0
0
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:34 pm
Oh, this old thing?
Rate this comment:
0
0