NC Budget Cutting Rampage Continues
By
{Pic by Artgerm at Deviant Art}
Education is getting slashed across the state. Mental Health is being decimated. Now all those other our other social services are going under the hatchet as well. To put this in perspective, the money saved in this budget will be a drop in the bucket compared to the strain put on counties and municipalities across the state. It will fall to us to provide services for our most vulnerable populations – children, disabled, mentally ill, elderly. The problem, of course, is that we local governments don’t have any money either. Non-profits are struggling as well. Families are losing jobs and making enormous sacrifices to make ends meet. This move by legislators is shortsighted and irresponsible. We’ll be paying for it one way or another, and all of us will be affected.
AC-T:
The General Assembly has proposed slashing $2.4 billion from the state’s Department of Health and Human Services budget over the next two years in an attempt to close a $4 billion budget gap.
In all, 717 state jobs in human services would be cut, and programs like N.C. Health Choice, the children’s health insurance plan for low-income families, would be slashed.
State DHHS Secretary Lanier Cansler said the cuts, if left as they are in the House version of the proposed budget, “would change the way we do things.â€
“If I eliminated every employee I have statewide, I’d only be halfway to the cut target,†Cansler said.
The Department of Health and Human Services accounts for 23 percent of the overall state budget, but it is being asked to take 50 percent of the cuts, said Elaine Mejia, director of the Budget & Tax Center of the N.C. Justice Center.
All of those teabaggers out there are getting their wish, deep cuts to that damnable nanny state. All the libertarians now have the chance to show us how the free market is going to solve the problem of caring for people without money or resources. All the Democrats and Republicans in Raleigh who think this budget is the right way forward ought to have sick children and elderly disabled people dropped at their doorsteps.
This budget will create crisis across the state now and for the next generation. Please contact your representative today and let him/her know what you think.
Rep. Susan Fisher – 919-715-2013 – Susan.Fisher@ncleg.net
Rep. Jane Whilden – 919-715-3012 – Jane.Whilden@ncleg.net
Sen. Martin Nesbitt – 919-715-3001 – Martin.Nesbitt@ncleg.net
If you’ve still got some wind in your sails, give a call to the House Leader and the Governor:
Joe Hackney – 919-733-3451 – Joe.Hackney@ncleg.net
Bev Perdue – 919-733-4240 – no email, but here’s an online contact form
8 Comments
June 8th, 2009 at 11:12 am
“All the libertarians now have the chance to show us how the free market is going to solve the problem of caring for people”
Let me know when the time comes where we actually have a free market, not just a somewhat less socialistic one.
Rate this comment:
0
0
June 8th, 2009 at 11:43 am
So you can’t help, Tim? Under what circumstances do you suppose you can get started?
Rate this comment:
0
0
June 8th, 2009 at 4:53 pm
I’m a Libertarian. We’d save a lot of money if we would:
1. End the death penalty
2. End Habitual Felon laws
3. Legalize marijuana
4. Stop putting non-violent drug offenders in prison
But you’ll never find a majority of Republicans OR Democrats willing to do any of these things. Instead, rather than ticking off some loud and powerful PACs, they’ll just cut indiscriminately. If they don’t cut, where do you propose they get the money for all these things they can’t afford now and haven’t been able to afford for years?
Rate this comment:
0
0
June 8th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Thanks, TJ, for your comment.
I imagine we’d see eye to eye on a lot of things. Perhaps I’m mistaken, but I’ve labored under the assumption that Libertarians would rather government not be involved in health and human services in the first place. If that’s the case, then let’s not pretend that by enacting 1-4 of your ideas there would be any room for the budgetary items under discussion here.
As to where the money ought to come from, I’d propose cutting the highway budget and raising revenue from all the non-resident, second-home owners.
Rate this comment:
0
0
June 8th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
You’re right about us. We don’t want government in much of anything, socially or economically. I’m a practicing attorney, and also elected (believe it or not!) to the Lenoir, NC City Council. As an attorney, I represent criminal defendants, juveniles, and parents who are caught up in the DSS system, so I see how the court system shafts the poor, uneducated, and drug-addicted. I don’t have a lot of faith in most of what government does.
As a Libertarian, I tend to agree with about half of what classic Democrats believe in (staying out of the bedroom) and half of what classic Republicans believe in (staying out of the economy). Unfortunately, these days most elected Dems AND Repubs want to look in our bedrooms and our bank accounts.
As far as your solutions, I’m in favor of giving over more private control of the highways, as long as those companies pay for it (with tolls, or whatever they can come up with). I’m not in favor of government-run toll roads, because they’ll just treat the tolls as a new revenue source, without reducing highway taxes otherwise. If we jack up taxes on the non-resident, second-home owners, they’ll just sell and move (as they already did when they came down here in the first place), further depressing our economy and land prices.
Rate this comment:
0
0
June 9th, 2009 at 6:57 am
I’m a Democrat because it’s obvious that third parties will never have any meaningful impact until we adopt a more modern form of government (parliamentary versus two party rule). That said, I agree that we could save money if we:
1. End the death penalty
2. Revamp the Habitual Felon laws
3. Legalize,regulate and tax all currently illegal drugs, substituting education and treatment.
4. Stop putting non-violent drug offenders in prison.
5. Curtail highway expansion.
6. Jack up taxes on non-resident, second-home owners. (This essentially embraces the Florida plan of “Homestead Exemption.” And it would have neglible effect on those who “came down here in the first place” since if they actually moved here, they would now be residents. It would also encourage some to stop pretending they aren’t residents – I have known many part-timers here over the past three decades who keep a foot in some other state to avoid our income taxes.)
Rate this comment:
0
0
June 9th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
Gordon,
Don’t forget to list Sen. Tom Apodaka in your list of state elected officials to contact. He is a Republican who represents quite a large swath of Western Buncombe County.
Thanks for bringing this to everyone’s attention.
Charles
Rate this comment:
0
0
June 21st, 2009 at 7:56 am
John,
DSS and mental agency already have an enormous amount of oversight. Having worked in both environments, let me tell you that the system is broken in part because of the overattention paid to fraud rather than quality. There’s occassionally fraud, but that happens in every sector. The problem is certainly not overspending on fraud, it’s an unwillingness to recognize that the problem is really big enough to require a large scale response.
I guess your comment is based on partisan political views rather than facts, but I thought I’d let you know that the ‘fraud’ tactic is patently false.
Rate this comment:
0
0