Asheville Citizen Survey Results Are In
ByThe City of Asheville contracted The National Citizen Survey group to poll city residents on a wide variety of subjects from government services to quality of life to affordable housing. The group used a mail-in survey method. They sent out 1,200 surveys, and over 400 were returned completed. According to the group’s statistical measures, this results in a 5% margin of error in results. They used data from other cities to create “benchmarks”, or mean values, and compared Asheville’s numbers to them. To have a look at the entire report, click here. Here’s a quick and dirty overview:
Quality of life
80% said that the quality of life in Asheville is “excellent” or “good” and that their neighborhood is an excellent or good place to live.
Transportation
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Ease of car travel – 55%
Ease of bus travel – 36%
Ease of bicycle travel – 23%
Ease of walking – 41%
Availability of paths and walking trails – 34%
Traffic flow on major streets – 27%
Street repair – 26%
Street cleaning – 51%
Street lighting – 56%
Snow removal – 58%
Sidewalk maintenance – 41%
Traffic signal timing – 37%
Bus or transit services – 46%
Amount of public parking – 19%
68% of respondents said that driving alone was their primary form of transportation.
Housing
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Availability of affordable quality housing – 12%
Variety of housing options – 28%
63% of respondents said that they pay less than 30% of their income for housing. 37% said they pay more.
Land Use and Zoning
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Overall quality of new development in Asheville – 40%
Overall appearance of Asheville – 68%
Land use, planning, and zoning – 16%
Code enforcement – 29%
Animal control – 52%
Regarding respondents’ perception of the rate of population growth in Asheville:
Much too fast – 23%
Somewhat too fast – 47%
Right amount – 29%
Somewhat too slow – 1%
Much too slow – 1%
“To what degree, if at all, are run down buildings, weed lots or junk vehicles a problem in Asheville?”
Major problem – 13%
Moderate problem – 41%
Minor problem – 36%
Not a problem – 10%
Economic Sustainability
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Employment opportunities – 15%
Shopping opportunities – 74%
Asheville as a place to work – 35%
Overall quality of business and service establishments – 67%
Regarding perceptions of speed of job growth:
Much too slow – 40%
Somewhat too slow – 51%
Right amount – 7%
Retail growth:
Much too slow – 2%
Somewhat too slow – 9%
Right amount – 46%
“What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months?”
Very negative – 23%
Somewhat negative – 43%
Neutral – 24%
Somewhat positive – 7%
Very positive – 2%
Public Safety
Percentage of respondents who answered “Very Safe” or “Somewhat Safe”:
Asheville’s downtown area after dark – 44%
Asheville’s downtown area during the day – 81%
Your neighborhood after dark – 73%
Your neighborhood during the day – 94%
From environmental hazards – 61%
From property crimes – 54%
From violent crimes – 63%
“During the past twelve months, were you or anyone in your household the victim of any crime?”
Yes – 22%
No – 78%
“If yes, was this crime (these crimes) reported to the police?”
Yes – 77%
No – 23%
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Police services – 68%
Fire services – 94%
Ambulance or emergency medical services – 90%
Crime prevention – 49%
Fire prevention and education – 70%
Traffic enforcement – 57%
Emergency preparedness – 42%
Environmental Sustainability
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Cleanliness of Asheville – 57%
Quality of overall natural environment in Asheville – 68%
Preservation of natural areas – 30%
Air quality – 39%
Drinking water – 63%
Storm drainage – 51%
Yard waste pickup – 67%
Recycling – 71%
Garbage Collection – 81%
Parks and Recreation
Rating of community recreational opportunities:
Excellent – 32%
Good – 41%
Fair – 18%
Poor – 10%
Percent of respondents who did each at least once in last 12 months:
Used Asheville recreation centers – 53%
Participated in a recreation program or activity – 45%
Visited a neighborhood or city park – 82%
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
City parks – 75%
Recreation programs or classes – 69%
Recreation centers or facilities – 67%
Culture, Arts, and Education
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Opportunities to attend cultural activities – 80%
Educational opportunities – 70%
Public schools – 61%
Public library services – 50%
Community Inclusiveness
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Sense of community – 70%
Openness and acceptance of the community towards people of diverse backgrounds – 73%
Asheville as a place to raise children – 71%
Asheville as a place to retire – 76%
Services to seniors – 49%
Services to youth – 42%
Services to low-income people – 32%
Civic Engagement
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Opportunities to participate in community matters – 68%
Opportunities to volunteer – 87%
Percent of respondents who did each at least once in last 12 months:
Attended a meeting of local elected officials or other local public meeting – 30%
Watched a meeting of local elected officials or other local public meeting on cable television – 58%
Volunteered your time to some group or activity in Asheville – 63%
Participated in a club or civic group in Asheville – 41%
Provided help to a friend or neighbor – 96%
“City of Asheville residents showed the largest amount of civic engagement in the area of electoral
participation. About 88% reported they were registered to vote; 83% indicated they had voted in
the last general election.”
Information and Awareness
“When asked whether they had visited the City of Asheville Web site in the previous 12 months, 63% reported they had done so at least once.”
Social Engagement
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
Opportunities to participate in social events and activities – 78%
Opportunities to participate in religious or spiritual events and activities – 83%
“About how often, if at all, do you talk to or visit with your immediate neighbors?”
Several times a week or more – 61%
Less than several times a week – 39%
Public Trust
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good”:
The value of services for the taxes paid to Asheville – 39%
The overall direction that Asheville is taking – 33%
The job Asheville government does at welcoming citizen involvement – 47%
The job Asheville government does at listening to citizens – 27%
Overall image or reputation of Asheville – 78%
Services provided by City of Asheville – 64%
Services provided by the Federal Government – 36%
Services provided by the State Government – 40%
Services provided by Buncombe County Government – 53%
City of Asheville Employees
“Have you had any in-person or phone contact with an employee of Asheville within the last 12 months?”
Yes – 60%
No – 40%
Those who responded that the following areas are “excellent” or “good” in regard to City employees:
Knowledge – 77%
Responsiveness – 77%
Courtesy – 79%
Overall Impression – 75%
The report then goes on to suggest action areas based on the results of the survey. Go read the whole thing!
12 Comments
November 18th, 2008 at 12:25 pm
Hard to look bad when you only allow citizens to respond “Excellent” or “Good”.
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
LOL
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Bryan,
There were other options, of course. Are you saying that the game was rigged? I don’t get it.
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Of course it was rigged. I didn’t get a survey but, I’m sure all the “right” people got one – winky, winky – the REAL Ashevillians – nudge, nudge!
I can’t wait to see the big press conference/photo op on WLOS.
This town has turned into a freakin’ joke!
Paris F***ing Hilton of the F***ing South INDEED!!!
But were all united and turning Blue!!!
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 2:02 pm
“Of course it was rigged”
?
This group has done hundreds of these things. I’m not sure why you’d jump to the conclusion that it’s false. I think the mail-in methodology leaves something to be desired, but it’s still a bona fide poll.
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
ahh, just had my kool-aid – it looks just dandy now.
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
Gordon,
Your right that there were other options. If you look at the actual breakdown of responses the outlook is less than good. The narrative however makes it out as if citizens either think what the city is doing is Excellent or Good. I do not think that it was rigged. I think that the report is misleading. These folks suspect that council will not dig that deep, nor will the media, so they are telling them what they want to hear.
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
I’m no statistician, but this largely seems like a big wank to me — feels good, but not much really gets accomplished.
The numbers are largely meaningless, I’d think, unless there’s some good demographic information to go with it. I mean, who is responding to this thing? Dual income aging hippies who drive hybrids and shop at Greenlife or single mothers who work at Wal-mart and live in Section 8 Housing?
By the way, how does one get a contract with the city to sit at the kitchen table and open a bunch of envelopes and then pop some numbers into a spreadsheet? I’m not doing anything these days.
MM
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
“By the way, how does one get a contract with the city to sit at the kitchen table and open a bunch of envelopes and then pop some numbers into a spreadsheet? I’m not doing anything these days.”
I’ll take bets 2-1 the “surveyors” knew a city employee or perhaps even a council member.
Perhaps we should commission a study to look into it…
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Its great that the city uses methodical, scientifically gathered data to self assess.
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 18th, 2008 at 9:40 pm
The most surprising finding for me is public safety. Do we really have a majority of people thinking that downtown isn’t safe after dark?
I’m surprised, too, by the low rating for the library system. There must have been a “no opinion” category.
Rate this comment:
0
0
November 19th, 2008 at 10:48 am
I wonder how much the city paid someone’s friend, uh, I mean the “consultant” to conduct this useless survey?
Rate this comment:
0
0